Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26619853›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2017

Practice management of acute trauma haemorrhage and haemostatic disorders across German trauma centres.

V Albrecht, N Schäfer, E K Stürmer, A Driessen, L Betsche, M Schenk, M Maegele

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Infrastructure, logistics and clinical practice management of acute trauma hemorrhage and coagulopathy: a survey across German trauma centers.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V AlbrechtInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, House 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany. verena.albrecht@uni-wh.de.
N SchäferInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, House 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
E K StürmerInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, House 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
A DriessenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Sports Traumatology, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
L BetscheInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, House 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
M SchenkInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, House 38, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
M MaegeleDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Sports Traumatology, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), Witten/Herdecke University, Campus Cologne-Merheim, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
Witten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly detection and management of trauma haemorrhage and coagulopathy have been associated with improved outcomes. We assessed infrastructure, logistics and management practice of trauma-associated haemorrhage and coagulopathy across German trauma centres.

methodsA web-based survey of 20 questions was developed using the open source survey application LimeSurvey

results145 Questionnaires were returned of which 106 were completed and analysed. Two-thirds of the respondents declared they worked in level I trauma centres. Only 61 % followed a treatment algorithm. Over 90 % used standard laboratory and coagulation tests for decision-making. 56.6 % declared they additionally used extended coagulation assays (TEG/ROTEM). Packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, platelet concentrates, prothrombin complex concentrates, tranexamic acid, calcium, fibrinogen and vitamin K were used by more than 85 % of the respondents for the initial treatment. In all hospitals, irrespective of care level, the first blood product was administered in less than 30 min upon patient arrival (49 % <15 min, 48.1 % <30 min). New oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were identified as an increasing problem in today`s trauma care (>95 %) and 65 % of the respondents necessitated reliable tests for early risk stratification. 57.6 % necessitated interdisciplinary training programs to improve clinical skills.

conclusionsThere is variation in the local infrastructure, logistics and management of trauma haemorrhage and coagulopathy across German trauma centres. More than one-third of the respondents declare they do not consistently follow a treatment algorithm. NOACs are considered as an increasing problem in acute trauma care.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysTrauma CentersAnticoagulantsBlood Coagulation DisordersBlood TransfusionGermanyGuideline AdherenceHemorrhageHemostaticsHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeWounds and InjuriesAnticoagulantsHemostaticsCoagulopathyManagementNOACsSurveyTrauma haemorrhageTreatment algorithm

Identifiers

PMID26619853
OpenAlexW2186568979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.