SynthesisJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2016
Renal Denervation vs Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- New data, new studies, new hopes for renal denervation in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.International Journal of Cardiology. Hypertension · 2019Review
- 2019 Consensus Statement of the Taiwan Hypertension Society and the Taiwan Society of Cardiology on Renal Denervation for the Management of Arterial Hypertension.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2019Review
- Effect of Radiofrequency-Based Renal Denervation: The Impact of Unplanned Medication Change from a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2019Article
- Renal sympathetic denervation: Ashes to ashes or rebirth from the ashes?Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2018Article
- Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension: Will It Ever Be Ready for "Prime Time"?American journal of hypertension · 2017Review
- Renal Denervation: a Field in Flux.Current hypertension reports · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effect of renal denervation (RD) for resistant hypertension remains controversial because of the conflicting results of finished and ongoing studies. The authors performed a meta-analysis of case-control studies to identify whether renal sympathetic denervation or pharmacotherapy (PHAR) was more effective for resistant hypertension. A systematic Internet database search of relevant papers written in English was performed. A total of nine studies met the inclusion criteria, with a total of 1096 patients. When comparing the RD group with the PHAR group, there was a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) (weighted mean difference, -12.81 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -22.77 mm Hg to -2.85 mm Hg; P=.01) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (weighted mean difference, -5.56; 95% CI, -8.15 mm Hg to -2.97 mm Hg; P<.0001). This pooled analysis shows that for patients with resistant hypertension, RD is more effective in reducing SBP and DBP than PHAR. RD may be more effective in special subgroups of patients, which needs to be identified in future investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.