Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26619227›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Long-Term Exposure to Primary Traffic Pollutants and Lung Function in Children: Cross-Sectional Study and Meta-Analysis.

Francesco Barone-Adesi, Jennifer E Dent, David Dajnak, Sean Beevers, H Ross Anderson, Frank J Kelly, Derek G Cook, Peter H Whincup

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Impact of Air Pollution on Asthma Outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Prenatal, Early-Life, and Childhood Exposure to Air Pollution and Lung Function: The ALSPAC Cohort.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesco Barone-AdesiMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Jennifer E DentMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
David DajnakMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Sean BeeversMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
H Ross AndersonMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Frank J KellyMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Derek G CookMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter H WhincupMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/L01341X/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 068362/Z/02/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is widespread concern about the possible health effects of traffic-related air pollution. Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a convenient marker of primary pollution. We investigated the associations between lung function and current residential exposure to a range of air pollutants (particularly NO2, NO, NOx and particulate matter) in London children. Moreover, we placed the results for NO2 in context with a meta-analysis of published estimates of the association. METHODS AND

findingsAssociations between primary traffic pollutants and lung function were investigated in 4884 children aged 9-10 years who participated in the Child Heart and Health Study in England (CHASE). A systematic literature search identified 13 studies eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. We combined results from the meta-analysis with the distribution of the values of FEV1 in CHASE to estimate the prevalence of children with abnormal lung function (FEV1<80% of predicted value) expected under different scenarios of NO2 exposure. In CHASE, there were non-significant inverse associations between all pollutants except ozone and both FEV1 and FVC. In the meta-analysis, a 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 was associated with an 8 ml lower FEV1 (95% CI: -14 to -1 ml; p: 0.016). The observed effect was not modified by a reported asthma diagnosis. On the basis of these results, a 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2 level would translate into a 7% (95% CI: 4% to 12%) increase of the prevalence of children with abnormal lung function.

conclusionsExposure to traffic pollution may cause a small overall reduction in lung function and increase the prevalence of children with clinically relevant declines in lung function.

Indexed as

Pulmonary VentilationAir PollutionAsthmaChildFemaleHumansInhalation ExposureMaleNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterVehicle EmissionsNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterVehicle Emissions

Identifiers

PMID26619227
PMCPMC4664276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.