Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26618796›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2016

A mixed-methods evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a mobile intervention for methadone maintenance clients.

Honoria Guarino, Michelle Acosta, Lisa A Marsch, Haiyi Xie, Yesenia Aponte-Melendez

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Honoria GuarinoCenter for Technology and Health, National Development and Research Institutes.ORCID 0000-0002-6533-6141
Michelle AcostaCenter for Technology and Health, National Development and Research Institutes.
Lisa A MarschCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Center for Psychiatric Research, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College.
Haiyi XieCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Center for Psychiatric Research, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Dartmouth College.
Yesenia Aponte-MelendezCenter for Technology and Health, National Development and Research Institutes.
National Development and Research Institutes · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · US

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Computer-Delivery of Effective, Psychosocial Interventions in Methadone TreatmentR01DA021818 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI MARSCH, LISA A. · 2006 to 2009
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIDA NIH HHS P30DA029926NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021818NIDA NIH HHS R01DA021818NIDA NIH HHS R01DA021818-01S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the recent explosion of behavioral health interventions delivered on mobile devices, little is known about factors that make such applications practical, engaging and useful to their target audience. This study reports on the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a prototype of a novel, interactive mobile psychosocial intervention to reduce problematic drug use among clients in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). A mixed-methods pilot study with new MMT clients (n = 25) indicated that the mobile intervention approach was feasible, and that participants found the intervention highly acceptable and useful. On 100-point visual analog scale (VAS) items, participants reported high levels of liking the program (M = 75.6), and endorsed it as useful (M = 77.5), easy to use (M = 80.7), and containing a significant amount of new information (M = 74.8). When compared with 25 study participants who received standard MMT alone, pilot participants rated their treatment significantly higher in interestingness and usefulness, and were significantly more satisfied with their treatment. In qualitative interviews, participants reported using the mobile intervention in a range of settings, including during times of heightened risk for substance use, and finding it helpful in managing drug cravings. Additionally, pilot participants showed evidence of increased treatment retention and abstinence from illicit opioids (in terms of effect size) over a 3-month period relative to those in standard MMT, suggesting the application's potential to enhance treatment outcomes. These promising findings suggest that an evidence-based mobile therapeutic tool addressing substance use may appeal to drug treatment clients and have clinical utility as an adjunct to formal treatment.

Indexed as

AdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsPsychotherapySubstance-Related DisordersTelemedicineYoung AdultMethadone

Identifiers

PMID26618796
PMCPMC4924621
OpenAlexW2444111938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.