Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26618160›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2015

The Elusive Antifibrotic Macrophage.

Adhyatmika Adhyatmika, Kurnia S S Putri, Leonie Beljaars, Barbro N Melgert

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Mechanobiology and Resolution of Lung Fibrosis.Annual review of physiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The role of RNA m6A demethylase ALKBH5 in the mechanisms of fibrosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Relaxin in fibrotic ligament diseases: Its regulatory role and mechanism.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  15. Harnessing Biomaterials for Immunomodulatory-Driven Tissue Engineering.Regenerative engineering and translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adhyatmika AdhyatmikaDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, Groningen Research Institute for Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands.
Kurnia S S PutriDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, Groningen Research Institute for Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands ; Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Groningen Research Institute for Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands ; Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Indonesia , Depok , Indonesia.
Leonie BeljaarsDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, Groningen Research Institute for Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands.
Barbro N MelgertDepartment of Pharmacokinetics, Toxicology and Targeting, Groningen Research Institute for Pharmacy (GRIP), University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands ; GRIAC Research Institute, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen , Groningen , Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fibrotic diseases, especially of the liver, the cardiovascular system, the kidneys, and the lungs, account for approximately 45% of deaths in Western societies. Fibrosis is a serious complication associated with aging and/or chronic inflammation or injury and cannot be treated effectively yet. It is characterized by excessive deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins by myofibroblasts and impaired degradation by macrophages. This ultimately destroys the normal structure of an organ, which leads to loss of function. Most efforts to develop drugs have focused on inhibiting ECM production by myofibroblasts and have not yielded many effective drugs yet. Another option is to stimulate the cells that are responsible for degradation and uptake of excess ECM, i.e., antifibrotic macrophages. However, macrophages are plastic cells that have many faces in fibrosis, including profibrotic behavior-stimulating ECM production. This can be dependent on their origin, as the different organs have tissue-resident macrophages with different origins and a various influx of incoming monocytes in steady-state conditions and during fibrosis. To be able to pharmacologically stimulate the right kind of behavior in fibrosis, a thorough characterization of antifibrotic macrophages is necessary, as well as an understanding of the signals they need to degrade ECM. In this review, we will summarize the current state of the art regarding the antifibrotic macrophage phenotype and the signals that stimulate its behavior.

Indexed as

antifibroticcathepsin KfibrosismacrophagesMMPmonocytespolarizationresolution

Identifiers

PMID26618160
PMCPMC4643133
OpenAlexW2216659273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.