Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26617983›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2015

De novo assembly of Dekkera bruxellensis: a multi technology approach using short and long-read sequencing and optical mapping.

Remi-Andre Olsen, Ignas Bunikis, Ievgeniia Tiukova, Kicki Holmberg, Britta Lötstedt, Olga Vinnere Pettersson, Volkmar Passoth, Max Käller, Francesco Vezzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Relationships Among Origin, Genotype, and Oenological Traits ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Near Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assessing Population Diversity ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High-QualityG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Remi-Andre OlsenDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.
Ignas BunikisUppsala Genome Center, NGI/SciLifeLab, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 815, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.
Ievgeniia TiukovaDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Kicki HolmbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.
Britta LötstedtDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.
Olga Vinnere PetterssonUppsala Genome Center, NGI/SciLifeLab, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, BMC, Box 815, SE-752 37 Uppsala, Sweden.
Volkmar PassothDepartment of Microbiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7025, SE-75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
Max KällerDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.
Francesco VezziDepartment of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm University, Box 1031, 171 21 Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt remains a challenge to perform de novo assembly using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Despite the availability of multiple sequencing technologies and tools (e.g., assemblers) it is still difficult to assemble new genomes at chromosome resolution (i.e., one sequence per chromosome). Obtaining high quality draft assemblies is extremely important in the case of yeast genomes to better characterise major events in their evolutionary history. The aim of this work is two-fold: on the one hand we want to show how combining different and somewhat complementary technologies is key to improving assembly quality and correctness, and on the other hand we present a de novo assembly pipeline we believe to be beneficial to core facility bioinformaticians. To demonstrate both the effectiveness of combining technologies and the simplicity of the pipeline, here we present the results obtained using the Dekkera bruxellensis genome.

methodsIn this work we used short-read Illumina data and long-read PacBio data combined with the extreme long-range information from OpGen optical maps in the task of de novo genome assembly and finishing. Moreover, we developed NouGAT, a semi-automated pipeline for read-preprocessing, de novo assembly and assembly evaluation, which was instrumental for this work.

resultsWe obtained a high quality draft assembly of a yeast genome, resolved on a chromosomal level. Furthermore, this assembly was corrected for mis-assembly errors as demonstrated by resolving a large collapsed repeat and by receiving higher scores by assembly evaluation tools. With the inclusion of PacBio data we were able to fill about 5 % of the optical mapped genome not covered by the Illumina data.

Indexed as

Genome, FungalChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDekkeraHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNASoftware

Identifiers

PMID26617983
PMCPMC4661999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.