Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26617824›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

MSH3 rs26279 polymorphism increases cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Hui-Kai Miao, Li-Ping Chen, Dong-Ping Cai, Wei-Ju Kong, Li Xiao, Jie Lin

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Variants in Sporadic Solid Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hui-Kai MiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.
Li-Ping ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.
Dong-Ping CaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.
Wei-Ju KongDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.
Li XiaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.
Jie LinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, The 101th Hospital of The People's Liberation Army Wuxi 214044, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the association of mutS homolog 3 (MSH3) rs26279 G > A polymorphism with the risk of different types of cancers including colorectal cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, thyroid cancer, ovarian cancer and oesophageal cancer. However, its association with cancer remains conflicting. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to derive a more precise estimation of the relationship between MSH3 rs26279 G > A polymorphism and cancer susceptibility. Systematically searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases yielded 11 publications with 12 studies of 3282 cases and 6476 controls. The strength of the association was determined by crude odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Overall, pooled risk estimates demonstrated that MSH3 rs26279 G > A was significantly associated with an increased overall cancer risk under all the genetic models (GG vs. AA: OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.09-1.48, P = 0.002; AG vs. AA: OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 1.00-1.21, P = 0.045; GG vs. AG + AA: OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.06-1.42, P = 0.005; AG + GG vs. AA: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.04-1.24, P = 0.006; G vs. A: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.05-1.20, P = 0.001). The association was more evident for colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Moreover, the significant association was also observed in the following subgroups: Europeans, Asians, population-based studies, hospital-based studies, and studies comprising relatively large sample size (≥ 200). Our meta-analysis results demonstrated that MSH3 rs26279 G > A polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of overall cancer, especially for the colorectal cancer and breast cancer.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA-Binding ProteinsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutS Homolog 3 ProteinNeoplasmsRisk FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsMSH3 protein, humanMutS Homolog 3 Proteincancermeta-analysisMSH3polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID26617824
PMCPMC4637639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.