ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015
The prognostic factors in the elderly patients with small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis from a single cancer institute.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of pretreatment smoking status for small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.Thoracic cancer · 2020Pooled it
- Trial
- Clinical impact and prognostic factors of early radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer cohort.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of the StAN score in elderly small cell lung cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Low diffusion capacity predicts poor prognosis in extensive stage small cell lung cancer: a single-center analysis of 10 years.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Knockdown of neuron-specific enolase suppresses the proliferation and migration of NCI-H209 cells.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the prognostic factors of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND
methodsThe records of elderly patients (≥ 65 years) with histologically-proven SCLC were reviewed. The patients' information including demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters, staging status on the Veterans Administration Lung Study Group staging system, and treatment modalities were registered. Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.
resultsBetween January 2004 and December 2012, 247 elderly patients with SCLC were analyzed, 129 patients initially presented with limited stage (LS) and 118 with extensive disease (ES). The median age of the patients was 70.7 years (range, 65-83 years). The median follow-up period for all patients was 22.0 months (range, 1.0-84.0 months) and 39.9 months for the surviving patients (range, 4.7-84.0 months). The median survival time (MST) was 17.3 months, and the 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 36.3% and 22.7%, respectively. The MST, 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 22 months, 45.0% and 30.5% in patients with limited stage, versus 13.4 months, 26.5% and 13.7% in patients having extensive diseases, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that disease extent (HR = 3.034; P < 0.001) and the number of chemotherapy cycles (HR = 0.486; P = 0.003) were independent prognostic factors for the OS. Additionally, a normal serum NSE level (HR = 0.447, P = 0.017) at the time of diagnosis was independent positive prognostic factors for patients with LS-SCLC, but not for ES-SCLC.
conclusionDisease extent and the number of chemotherapy cycles were independent prognostic factors of elderly patients with SCLC. The fit cohort might benefit from positive treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26617821PMC4637636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.