Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26617703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2015

Ischemia-reperfusion model in rat spinal cord: cell viability and apoptosis signaling study.

Mário Sérgio Lima de Lavor, Nancy Scardua Binda, Fabíola Bono Fukushima, Fátima Maria Caetano Caldeira, Juliana Figueira da Silva, Carla Maria Osório Silva, Karen Maciel de Oliveira, Bernardo de Caro Martins, Bruno Benetti Junta Torres, Isabel Rodrigues Rosado and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mário Sérgio Lima de LavorDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil ; Departamento de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil.
Nancy Scardua BindaINCT, Laboratório de Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
Fabíola Bono FukushimaDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Fátima Maria Caetano CaldeiraDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Juliana Figueira da SilvaINCT, Laboratório de Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
Carla Maria Osório SilvaDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Karen Maciel de OliveiraDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Bernardo de Caro MartinsDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Bruno Benetti Junta TorresDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Isabel Rodrigues RosadoDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Renato Santiago GomezINCT, Laboratório de Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
Marcus Vinícius GomezINCT, Laboratório de Neurociências, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais.
Eliane Gonçalves de MeloDepartamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Escola de Veterinária, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work aimed at determining the ideal ischemia time in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model of spinal cord injury. Rat spinal cord slices were prepared and then exposed or not to oxygen deprivation and low glucose (ODLG) for 30, 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes. Cell viability was assessed by triphenyltetrazolium (TTC), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, and fluorochrome dyes specific for cell dead (ethidium homodimer) using the apotome system. Glutamate release was enzymatically measured by a fluorescent method. Gene expression of apoptotic factors was assessed by real time RT-PCR. Whereas spinal cord slices exposed to ODLG exhibited mild increase in fluorescence for 30 minutes after the insult, the 45, 60, 75 and 90 minutes caused a 2-fold increase. ODLG exposure for 45, 60, 75 or 90 minutes, glutamate and LDH release were significantly elevated. nNOS mRNA expression was overexpressed for 45 minutes and moderately increased for 60 minutes in ODLG groups. Bax/bcl-xl ratio, caspase 9 and caspase 3 mRNA expressions were significantly increased for 45 minutes of ODLG, but not for 30, 60, 75 and 90 minutes. Results showed that cell viability reduction in the spinal cord was dependent on ischemic time, resulting in glutamate and LDH release. ODLG for 45 minutes was adequate for gene expression evaluation of proteins and proteases involved in apoptosis pathways.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsApoptosisCell SurvivalOrgan Culture TechniquesRatsRats, WistarReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReperfusion InjurySignal TransductionSpinal Cord IschemiaTime FactorsApoptosiscell viabilityexcitotoxicityoxygen deprivation low glucosespinal cord ischemia

Identifiers

PMID26617703
PMCPMC4637788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.