Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26617667›Full record

ArticleExpert review of obstetrics & gynecology2011

Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Lyndsay A Richardson, Joseph Tota, Eduardo L Franco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of obstetrics & gynecology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. The road ahead for cervical cancer prevention and control.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyndsay A RichardsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, 546 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H2W 1S6, Canada.
Joseph TotaDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, 546 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H2W 1S6, Canada.
Eduardo L FrancoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, 546 Pine Avenue West, Montreal, QC, H2W 1S6, Canada.
McGill University · CA

Funding

Effect of Oxidant Load on HPV Persistence and CIN (SIL)R01CA081310 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI GIULIANO, ANNA R. · 2000 to 2008
$3.2M
MOLECULAR EPIDEMIOLOGY OF PERSISTENT HPV INFECTIONR01CA070269 · NCI · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCO, EDUARDO L. · 1996 to 2003
$793k
HITCH: A Study of HPV Transmission in Young CouplesR01AI073889 · NIAID · MCGILL UNIVERSITY · PI FRANCO, EDUARDO L. · 2010 to 2013
$419k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA070269NCI NIH HHS R01 CA081310NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although historically successful in reducing the burden of cervical cancer, Papanicolaou (Pap) testing faces numerous limitations. A growing body of evidence suggests that modern screening practice will benefit from primary screening for high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, the causative agent of cervical cancer. Molecular tests detecting the presence of HPV nucleic acids consistently demonstrate high sensitivity relative to Pap testing, and provide reliable, dichotomous results. Pap cytology is ideally suited to triage HPV-positive cases owing to its high test specificity, and the accuracy of cytological readings will be maximized in high-prevalence conditions. This algorithm of primary HPV testing with Pap triage has been shown to maintain the high sensitivity of HPV testing without compromising Pap cytology's strong ability to rule out falsely positive diagnoses. Given the anticipated decline of high-risk HPV-16 and -18 infections in the emergent post-HPV vaccination era, highly sensitive primary HPV testing is especially warranted. Novel screening technologies that identify HPV viral gene expression continue to emerge and seek to complement current HPV testing by identifying those women who may be at risk of progressive disease. How to best incorporate these new technologies into clinical practice presents our next great challenge. Implementation of novel algorithms for cervical screening is not a trivial task. Avoidance of exceedingly complex screening algorithms is an important priority.

Indexed as

cervical cancerhuman papillomavirushuman papillomavirus vaccinemass screeningPapanicolaou testtest performance

Identifiers

PMID26617667
PMCPMC4659856
OpenAlexW2036210769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.