ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015
Development and Utilization of InDel Markers to Identify Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Disease Resistance.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing Peanut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Identification of Insertion and Deletion (InDel) Markers for Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Construction of a genetic linkage map and QTL mapping of fruit quality traits in guava (Frontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Association of differentially expressed R-gene candidates with leaf spot resistance in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Development of Genome-Wide Functional Markers Using Draft Genome Assembly of Guava (Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Development and Application of InDel Markers for Capsicum spp. Based on Whole-Genome Re-Sequencing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Identification of expressed R-genes associated with leaf spot diseases in cultivated peanut.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
- The poplar pangenome provides insights into the evolutionary history of the genus.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Introgression of peanut smut resistance from landraces to elite peanut cultivars (Arachis hypogaea L.).PloS one · 2019Article
- New tools to screen wild peanut species for aflatoxin accumulation and genetic fingerprinting.BMC plant biology · 2018Article
- Genome-Wide Discovery and Deployment of Insertions and Deletions Markers Provided Greater Insights on Species, Genomes, and Sections Relationships in the GenusFrontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Genomic survey sequencing for development and validation of single-locus SSR markers in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.).BMC genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peanut diseases, such as leaf spot and spotted wilt caused by Tomato Spotted Wilt Virus, can significantly reduce yield and quality. Application of marker assisted plant breeding requires the development and validation of different types of DNA molecular markers. Nearly 10,000 SSR-based molecular markers have been identified by various research groups around the world, but less than 14.5% showed polymorphism in peanut and only 6.4% have been mapped. Low levels of polymorphism limit the application of marker assisted selection (MAS) in peanut breeding programs. Insertion/deletion (InDel) markers have been reported to be more polymorphic than SSRs in some crops. The goals of this study were to identify novel InDel markers and to evaluate the potential use in peanut breeding. Forty-eight InDel markers were developed from conserved sequences of functional genes and tested in a diverse panel of 118 accessions covering six botanical types of cultivated peanut, of which 104 were from the U.S. mini-core. Results showed that 16 InDel markers were polymorphic with polymorphic information content (PIC) among InDels ranged from 0.017 to 0.660. With respect to botanical types, PICs varied from 0.176 for fastigiata var., 0.181 for hypogaea var., 0.306 for vulgaris var., 0.534 for aequatoriana var., 0.556 for peruviana var., to 0.660 for hirsuta var., implying that aequatoriana var., peruviana var., and hirsuta var. have higher genetic diversity than the other types and provide a basis for gene functional studies. Single marker analysis was conducted to associate specific marker to disease resistant traits. Five InDels from functional genes were identified to be significantly correlated to tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) infection and leaf spot, and these novel markers will be utilized to identify disease resistant genotype in breeding populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.