Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26617195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Mortality Benefits of Antibiotic Computerised Decision Support System: Modifying Effects of Age.

Angela L P Chow, David C Lye, Onyebuchi A Arah

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04011657 (Effective Antimicrobial StewaRdship StrategIES), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04011657 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effective Antimicrobial StewaRdship StrategIES (ARIES): Cluster-randomized Trial of a Computerized Decision Support System Versus Antibiotic Prospective Review and Feedback in Antimicrobial Stewardship

TypeinterventionalSponsorTan Tock Seng HospitalRan2017 to 2018Enrolled1,257ConditionsInfection, BacterialArmsCompulsory CDSS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical impact of accepting or rejecting a recommendation from a clinical decision support system-assisted antibiotic stewardship program.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Angela L P ChowDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Institute of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
David C LyeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Institute of Infectious Disease and Epidemiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Onyebuchi A ArahDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, United States.
Tan Tock Seng Hospital · SGUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antibiotic computerised decision support systems (CDSSs) are shown to improve antibiotic prescribing, but evidence of beneficial patient outcomes is limited. We conducted a prospective cohort study in a 1500-bed tertiary-care hospital in Singapore, to evaluate the effectiveness of the hospital's antibiotic CDSS on patients' clinical outcomes, and the modification of these effects by patient factors. To account for clustering, we used multilevel logistic regression models. One-quarter of 1886 eligible inpatients received CDSS-recommended antibiotics. Receipt of antibiotics according to CDSS's recommendations seemed to halve mortality risk of patients (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.26-1.10, P = 0.09). Patients aged ≤65 years had greater mortality benefit (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.20-1.00, P = 0.05) than patients that were older than 65 (OR 1.28, 95% CI 0.91-1.82, P = 0.16). No effect was observed on incidence of Clostridium difficile (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.34-3.01), and multidrug-resistant organism (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.42-2.71) infections. No increase in infection-related readmission (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.48-2.79) was found in survivors. Receipt of CDSS-recommended antibiotics reduced mortality risk in patients aged 65 years or younger and did not increase the risk in older patients. Physicians should be informed of the benefits to increase their acceptance of CDSS recommendations.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsClostridioides difficileCross InfectionDecision Support Systems, ClinicalDrug PrescriptionsAcademic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathComorbidityDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26617195
PMCPMC4663624
OpenAlexW2297697486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.