Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26616211›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2016

Current disease modifying approaches to treat Parkinson's disease.

Dan Lindholm, Johanna Mäkelä, Valentina Di Liberto, Giuseppa Mudò, Natale Belluardo, Ove Eriksson, Mart Saarma

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. IBRO neuroscience reports · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Discovery of a functionally selective ghrelin receptor (GHSRProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Cell-Cell Communication AlterationsFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Understanding the Potential of Genome Editing in Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dan LindholmMedicum, Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. dan.lindholm@helsinki.fi.
Johanna MäkeläMedicum, Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Valentina Di LibertoDivision of Human Physiology, Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Corso Tukory 129, 90134, Palermo, Italy.
Giuseppa MudòDivision of Human Physiology, Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Corso Tukory 129, 90134, Palermo, Italy.
Natale BelluardoDivision of Human Physiology, Department of Experimental Biomedicine and Clinical Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Corso Tukory 129, 90134, Palermo, Italy.
Ove ErikssonMedicum, Department of Biochemistry and Developmental Biology, Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 63, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Mart SaarmaInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, P.O.Box 56, Viikinkaari 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Palermo · ITMinerva Foundation · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinson's disease (PD is a progressive neurological disorder characterized by the degeneration and death of midbrain dopamine and non-dopamine neurons in the brain leading to motor dysfunctions and other symptoms, which seriously influence the quality of life of PD patients. The drug L-dopa can alleviate the motor symptoms in PD, but so far there are no rational therapies targeting the underlying neurodegenerative processes. Despite intensive research, the molecular mechanisms causing neuronal loss are not fully understood which has hampered the development of new drugs and disease-modifying therapies. Neurotrophic factors are by virtue of their survival promoting activities attract candidates to counteract and possibly halt cell degeneration in PD. In particular, studies employing glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and its family member neurturin (NRTN), as well as the recently described cerebral dopamine neurotrophic factor (CDNF) and the mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF) have shown positive results in protecting and repairing dopaminergic neurons in various models of PD. Other substances with trophic actions in dopaminergic neurons include neuropeptides and small compounds that target different pathways impaired in PD, such as increased cell stress, protein handling defects, dysfunctional mitochondria and neuroinflammation. In this review, we will highlight the recent developments in this field with a focus on trophic factors and substances having the potential to beneficially influence the viability and functions of dopaminergic neurons as shown in preclinical or in animal models of PD.

Indexed as

alpha-SynucleinAnimalsDopaminergic NeuronsGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorHumansMitochondriaNerve Growth FactorsNeuroprotective AgentsNeurturinParkinson DiseaseRecombinant ProteinsUnfolded Protein Responsealpha-SynucleinCDNF protein, humanGDNF protein, humanGlial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic FactorNerve Growth FactorsNeuroprotective AgentsNeurturinRecombinant ProteinsDopamine neuronsER stressMitochondriaNeuroinflammationNeuropeptidesNeurotrophic factorsProtein aggregationα-Synuclein

Identifiers

PMID26616211
PMCPMC11108524
OpenAlexW2186612922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.