Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26616048›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2015

Community health centers and primary care access and quality for chronically-ill patients - a case-comparison study of urban Guangdong Province, China.

Leiyu Shi, De-Chih Lee, Hailun Liang, Luwen Zhang, Marty Makinen, Nathan Blanchet, Ruth Kidane, Magnus Lindelow, Hong Wang, Shaolong Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Barriers to Community-Based Primary Health Care Delivery in Urban China: A Systematic Mapping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Trajectories of Outpatient Service Utilisation of Hypertensive Patients in Tertiary Hospitals in China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Trends and Inequalities in the Health Care and Hypertension Outcomes in China, 2011 to 2015.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leiyu ShiJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. lshi@jhsph.edu.
De-Chih LeeDepartment of Information Management, Da-Yeh University, Changhua, 51591, Taiwan (ROC). dclee@mail.dyu.edu.tw.
Hailun LiangJohns Hopkins Primary Care Policy Center, Baltimore, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. hliang16@jhu.edu.
Luwen ZhangSchool of Public Health of Sun Yat-sen University, 74, Zhongshan Road II, Guangzhou, 510275, China. zhangluwen1986@139.com.
Marty MakinenResults for Development Institute, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. mmakinen@r4d.org.
Nathan BlanchetResults for Development Institute, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. nblanchet@r4d.org.
Ruth KidaneResults for Development Institute, 1100 15th Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. rkidane@r4d.org.
Magnus LindelowThe World Bank, 1225 Connecticut Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20433, USA. mlindelow@worldbank.org.
Hong WangBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, 500 Fifth Avenue North, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA. Hong.Wang@gatesfoundation.org.
Shaolong WuSchool of Public Health of Sun Yat-sen University, 74, Zhongshan Road II, Guangzhou, 510275, China. wushlong@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReform of the health care system in urban areas of China has prompted concerns about the utilization of Community Health Centers (CHC). This study examined which of the dominant primary care delivery models, i.e., the public CHC model, the 'gate-keeper' CHC model, or the hospital-owned CHC models, was most effective in enhancing access to and quality of care for patients with chronic illness.

methodsThe case-comparison design was used to study nine health care organizations in Guangzhou, Dongguan, and Shenzhen cities within Guangdong province, China. 560 patients aged 50 or over with hypertension or diabetes who visited either CHCs or hospitals in these three cities were surveyed by using face-to-face interviews. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare quality and value of care indicators among subjects from the three cities. Multivariate analyses were used to assess the association between type of primary care delivery and quality as well as value of chronic care after controlling for patients' demographic and health status characteristics.

resultsPatients from all three cities chose their current health care providers primarily out of concern for quality of care (both provider expertise and adequate medical equipment), patient-centered care, and insurance plan requirement. Compared with patients from Guangzhou, those from Dongguan performed significantly better on most quality and value of care indicators. Most of these indicators remained significantly better even after controlling for patients' demographic and health status characteristics. The Shenzhen model (hospital-owned and -managed CHC) was generally effective in enhancing accessibility and continuity. However, coordination suffered due to seemingly duplicating primary care outpatients at the hospital setting. Significant associations between types of health care facilities and quality of care were also observed such that patients from CHCs were more likely to be satisfied with traveling time and follow-up care by their providers.

conclusionThe study suggested that the Dongguan model (based on insurance mandate and using family practice physicians as 'gate-keepers') seemed to work best in terms of improving access and quality for patients with chronic conditions. The study suggested adequately funded and well-organized primary care system can play a gatekeeping role and has the potential to provide a reasonable level of care to patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesChinaChronic DiseaseCommunity Health CentersFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID26616048
PMCPMC4663727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.