Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26615564›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Breast cancer subtype as a predictor for outcomes and control in the setting of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Christopher S Grubb, Ashish Jani, Cheng-Chia Wu, Shumaila Saad, Yasir H Qureshi, Tavish Nanda, Andrew Yaeh, Tzlil Rozenblat, Michael B Sisti, Jeffrey N Bruce and 8 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Treatment Strategies for Oligometastatic Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with breast cancer brain oligometastases - molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. HyperpolarizedNeuro-oncology advances
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher S GrubbDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Ashish JaniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Cheng-Chia WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Shumaila SaadDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Yasir H QureshiThe Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Tavish NandaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Andrew YaehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Tzlil RozenblatDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Michael B SistiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jeffrey N BruceDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Guy M McKhannDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Sameer A ShethDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Jeraldine LesserDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Simon K ChengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Steven R IsaacsonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Andrew B LassmanHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, 1130 St Nicholas Ave, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Eileen P ConnollyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Tony J C WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, BNH B011, New York, NY, 10032, USA. tjw2117@cumc.columbia.edu.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated effects of breast cancer subtype on overall survival (OS), local and distant control, and time from initial diagnosis to brain metastases (BM). We also investigated advances in graded prognostic assessment (GPA) scores. A cohort of 72 patients treated for BM from breast cancer with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery at our institution from 2000 to 2014 had subtyping available and were used for this study. Median follow up for OS was 12 months and for control was 6 months. OS for luminal, HER2, and triple negative subtypes were 26, 20, and 22 months. OS when stratified by Sperduto et al. (J Clin Oncol 30(4):419-425, 2012) and Subbiah et al. (J Clin Oncol 33(20):2239-2245, 2015) GPAs were similar (p = 0.087 and p = 0.063). KPS and treatment modality were significant for OS (p = 0.002; p = 0.034). On univariate analysis, triple negative subtype and >3 BM were trending and significant for decreased OS (p = 0.084; p = 0.047). On multivariable analysis HER2, triple negative, and >3 BM were significant for OS (p = 0.022; p = 0.040; p = 0.009). Subtype was significant for response on a per lesion basis (p = 0.007). Subtype was trending towards significance when analyzing time from initial diagnosis to BM treatment (p = 0.064). Breast cancer subtype is an important prognostic factor when stratifying breast cancer patients with BM. The addition of number of BM to the GPA is a useful addition and should be further investigated. Subtype has an effect on lesion response, and also on rate of development BM after initial diagnosis.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBrain metastasesBreast cancerGraded prognostic assessment (GPA)Stereotactic radiosurgerySubtype

Identifiers

PMID26615564
OpenAlexW2185774221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.