Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26615519›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2015

A systematic review of predictive models for asthma development in children.

Gang Luo, Flory L Nkoy, Bryan L Stone, Darell Schmick, Michael D Johnson

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Machine learning-based early prediction of asthma in preschoolers: The COCOA birth cohort study.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Early Prediction of Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The Pediatric Asthma Risk Score: More does not mean better.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Association between peripheral blood mononuclear cellThe Journal of international medical research · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gang LuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Suite 140, 421 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. gang.luo@utah.edu.
Flory L NkoyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Bryan L StoneDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
Darell SchmickSpencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, 10 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Michael D JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 100 N Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84113, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is the most common pediatric chronic disease affecting 9.6 % of American children. Delay in asthma diagnosis is prevalent, resulting in suboptimal asthma management. To help avoid delay in asthma diagnosis and advance asthma prevention research, researchers have proposed various models to predict asthma development in children. This paper reviews these models.

methodsA systematic review was conducted through searching in PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, the ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, and OpenGrey up to June 3, 2015. The literature on predictive models for asthma development in children was retrieved, with search results limited to human subjects and children (birth to 18 years). Two independent reviewers screened the literature, performed data extraction, and assessed article quality.

resultsThe literature search returned 13,101 references in total. After manual review, 32 of these references were determined to be relevant and are discussed in the paper. We identify several limitations of existing predictive models for asthma development in children, and provide preliminary thoughts on how to address these limitations.

conclusionsExisting predictive models for asthma development in children have inadequate accuracy. Efforts to improve these models' performance are needed, but are limited by a lack of a gold standard for asthma development in children.

Indexed as

AsthmaModels, TheoreticalChildHumans

Identifiers

PMID26615519
PMCPMC4662818
OpenAlexW2177512971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.