Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26615416›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2016

Do monkeys compare themselves to others?

Vanessa Schmitt, Ira Federspiel, Johanna Eckert, Stefanie Keupp, Laura Tschernek, Lauriane Faraut, Richard Schuster, Corinna Michels, Holger Sennhenn-Reulen, Thomas Bugnyar and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Long-tailed macaques: an unfairness model for humans.Communicative & integrative biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vanessa SchmittSocial Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Str. 2, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Ira FederspielDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Johanna EckertCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Stefanie KeuppCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Laura TschernekCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Lauriane FarautCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Richard SchusterDepartment of Forest and Conservation Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Corinna MichelsSocial Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Str. 2, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Holger Sennhenn-ReulenLeibniz ScienceCampus Primate Cognition, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas MussweilerSocial Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Str. 2, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
Julia FischerCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Kellnerweg 4, 37077, Göttingen, Germany. jfischer@dpz.eu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social comparisons are a fundamental characteristic of human behaviour, yet relatively little is known about their evolutionary foundations. Adapting the co-acting paradigm from human research (Seta in J Pers Soc Psychol 42:281-291, 1982. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.42.2.281), we examined how the performance of a partner influenced subjects' performance in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Using parallel testing in touch screen setups in which subjects had to discriminate familiar and novel photographs of men and women, we investigated whether accuracy and reaction time were influenced by partner performance and relationship quality (affiliate vs. non-affiliate). Auditory feedback about the alleged performance of the co-actor was provided via playback; partner performance was either moderately or extremely better or worse than subject performance. We predicted that subjects would assimilate to moderately different comparison standards as well as to affiliates and contrast away from extreme standards and non-affiliates. Subjects instantly generalized to novel pictures. While accuracy was not affected by any of the factors, long reaction times occurred more frequently when subjects were tested with a non-affiliate who was performing worse, compared to one who was doing better than them (80% quantile worse: 5.1, better: 4.3 s). For affiliate co-actors, there was no marked effect (worse: 4.4, better: 4.6 s). In a control condition with no auditory feedback, subjects performed somewhat better in the presence of affiliates (M = 77.8% correct) compared to non-affiliates (M = 71.1%), while reaction time was not affected. Apparently, subjects were sensitive to partner identity and performance, yet variation in motivation rather than assimilation and contrast effects may account for the observed effects.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorSocial BehaviorAnimalsCognitionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleMacaca fascicularisMaleReaction TimeCo-acting paradigmEvolutionInequity aversionMeta-cognitionMonkeysNon-human primatesSocial comparison processesSocial relationships

Identifiers

PMID26615416
PMCPMC4751161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.