Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26615393›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Small-area spatio-temporal analyses of participation rates in the mammography screening program in the city of Dortmund (NW Germany).

Dorothea Lemke, Shoma Berkemeyer, Volkmar Mattauch, Oliver Heidinger, Edzer Pebesma, Hans-Werner Hense

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dorothea LemkeInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 D3, D 48149, Münster, Germany. dorothea.lemke@uni-muenster.de.
Shoma BerkemeyerReference Center for the Mammography Screening Program, University Hospital, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany. berkemeyer@referenzzentrum-ms.de.
Volkmar MattauchEpidemiological Cancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia, Münster, Germany. Volkmar.Mattauch@krebsregister.nrw.de.
Oliver HeidingerEpidemiological Cancer Registry North Rhine-Westphalia, Münster, Germany. Oliver.Heidinger@krebsregister.nrw.de.
Edzer PebesmaInstitute for Geoinformatics, Geosciences Faculty, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Münster, Germany. edzer.pebesma@uni-muenster.de.
Hans-Werner HenseInstitute of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Medical Faculty, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1 D3, D 48149, Münster, Germany. hense@uni-muenster.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe population-based mammography screening program (MSP) was implemented by the end of 2005 in Germany, and all women between 50 and 69 years are actively invited to a free biennial screening examination. However, despite the expected benefits, the overall participation rates range only between 50 and 55%. There is also increasing evidence that belonging to a vulnerable population, such as ethnic minorities or low income groups, is associated with a decreased likelihood of participating in screening programs. This study aimed to analyze in more detail the intra-urban variation of MSP uptake at the neighborhood level (i.e. statistical districts) for the city of Dortmund in northwest Germany and to identify demographic and socioeconomic risk factors that contribute to non-response to screening invitations.

methodsThe numbers of participants by statistical district were aggregated over the three periods 2007/2008, 2009/2010, and 2011/2012. Participation rates were calculated as numbers of participants per female resident population averaged over each 2-year period. Bayesian hierarchical spatial models extended with a temporal and spatio-temporal interaction effect were used to analyze the participation rates applying integrated nested Laplace approximations (INLA). The model included explanatory covariates taken from the atlas of social structure of Dortmund.

resultsGenerally, participation rates rose for all districts over the time periods. However, participation was persistently lowest in the inner city of Dortmund. Multivariable regression analysis showed that migrant status and long-term unemployment were associated with significant increases of non-attendance in the MSP.

conclusionLow income groups and immigrant populations are clustered in the inner city of Dortmund and the observed spatial pattern of persistently low participation in the city center is likely linked to the underlying socioeconomic gradient. This corresponds with the findings of the ecological regression analysis manifesting socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods as risk factors for low attendance in the MSP. Spatio-temporal surveillance of participation in cancer screening programs may be used to identify spatial inequalities in screening uptake and plan spatially focused interventions.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGermanyHumansMammographyMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsSmall-Area AnalysisSocioeconomic FactorsSpatio-Temporal Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26615393
PMCPMC4663041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.