ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2016
Towards improved genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions: unification, transcript specificity and beyond.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review of Current Human Genome-Scale Metabolic Models for Brain Cancer and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Cells · 2022Review
- Importance of the biomass formulation for cancer metabolic modeling and drug prediction.iScience · 2021Article
- Article
- IDARE2-Simultaneous Visualisation of Multiomics Data in Cytoscape.Metabolites · 2021Article
- Simultaneous Integration of Gene Expression and Nutrient Availability for Studying the Metabolism of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines.Biomolecules · 2021Article
- Assessing key decisions for transcriptomic data integration in biochemical networks.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Towards the network-based prediction of repurposed drugs using patient-specific metabolic models.EBioMedicine · 2019Article
- Automated generation of genome-scale metabolic draft reconstructions based on KEGG.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Putting primary metabolism into perspective to obtain better fruits.Annals of botany · 2018Review
- Framework and resource for more than 11,000 gene-transcript-protein-reaction associations in human metabolism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
- EColiCore2: a reference network model of the central metabolism of Escherichia coli and relationships to its genome-scale parent model.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Constraint Based Modeling Going Multicellular.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2016Review
- Understanding the Causes and Implications of Endothelial Metabolic Variation in Cardiovascular Disease through Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-scale metabolic network reconstructions provide a basis for the investigation of the metabolic properties of an organism. There are reconstructions available for multiple organisms, from prokaryotes to higher organisms and methods for the analysis of a reconstruction. One example is the use of flux balance analysis to improve the yields of a target chemical, which has been applied successfully. However, comparison of results between existing reconstructions and models presents a challenge because of the heterogeneity of the available reconstructions, for example, of standards for presenting gene-protein-reaction associations, nomenclature of metabolites and reactions or selection of protonation states. The lack of comparability for gene identifiers or model-specific reactions without annotated evidence often leads to the creation of a new model from scratch, as data cannot be properly matched otherwise. In this contribution, we propose to improve the predictive power of metabolic models by switching from gene-protein-reaction associations to transcript-isoform-reaction associations, thus taking advantage of the improvement of precision in gene expression measurements. To achieve this precision, we discuss available databases that can be used to retrieve this type of information and point at issues that can arise from their neglect. Further, we stress issues that arise from non-standardized building pipelines, like inconsistencies in protonation states. In addition, problems arising from the use of non-specific cofactors, e.g. artificial futile cycles, are discussed, and finally efforts of the metabolic modelling community to unify model reconstructions are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.