Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26614617›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Determinants of access to chronic illness care: a mixed-methods evaluation of a national multifaceted chronic disease package for Indigenous Australians.

Jodie Bailie, Gill Schierhout, Alison Laycock, Margaret Kelaher, Nikki Percival, Lynette O'Donoghue, Tracy McNeair, Ross Bailie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review of Group A StreptococcalThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. "Float[ing] in the Middle" Nurse Navigators and the Interface of Access to Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jodie BailieMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Gill SchierhoutMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Alison LaycockMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Margaret KelaherCentre for Health Policy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nikki PercivalMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Lynette O'DonoghueMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Tracy McNeairMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Ross BailieMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Menzies School of Health Research · AUCharles Darwin University · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIndigenous Australians have a disproportionately high burden of chronic illness, and relatively poor access to healthcare. This paper examines how a national multicomponent programme aimed at improving prevention and management of chronic disease among Australian Indigenous people addressed various dimensions of access.

designData from a place-based, mixed-methods formative evaluation were analysed against a framework that defines supply and demand-side dimensions to access. The evaluation included 24 geographically bounded 'sentinel sites' that included a range of primary care service organisations. It drew on administrative data on service utilisation, focus group and interview data on community members' and service providers' perceptions of chronic illness care between 2010 and 2013.

settingUrban, regional and remote areas of Australia that have relatively large Indigenous populations.

participants670 community members participated in focus groups; 374 practitioners and representatives of regional primary care support organisations participated in in-depth interviews.

resultsThe programme largely addressed supply-side dimensions of access with less focus or impact on demand-side dimensions. Application of the access framework highlighted the complex inter-relationships between dimensions of access. Key ongoing challenges are achieving population coverage through a national programme, reaching high-need groups and ensuring provision of ongoing care.

conclusionsStrategies to improve access to chronic illness care for this population need to be tailored to local circumstances and address the range of dimensions of access on both the demand and supply sides. These findings highlight the importance of flexibility in national programme guidelines to support locally determined strategies.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesChronic DiseaseFees, MedicalFinancing, GovernmentFocus GroupsHealth Services, IndigenousHumansInterviews as TopicPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareProgram EvaluationPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26614617
PMCPMC4663407
OpenAlexW2173729970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.