Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26614535›Full record

SynthesisClinical rheumatology2016

Increased carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: an update meta-analysis.

Peng Wang, Shi-Yang Guan, Shu-Zhen Xu, Hong-Miao Li, Rui-Xue Leng, Xiang-Pei Li, Hai-Feng Pan

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Subclinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a case cohort analysis from ELSA-Brasil.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Do individuals with autoimmune disease have increased risk of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis and stiffness?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peng WangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China.
Shi-Yang GuanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China.
Shu-Zhen XuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Miao LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China.
Rui-Xue LengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China.
Xiang-Pei LiDepartment of Rheumatology, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, China.
Hai-Feng PanDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230032, People's Republic of China. panhaifeng1982@sina.com.
Anhui Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNAnhui Medical University · CNAnhui Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to derive a more precise estimation on carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) level in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and related factors. Studies published from January 1, 1982 to December 31, 2014 in English, which comparing CIMT between RA group and control group were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Heterogeneity test was performed, and publication bias was evaluated. Stata software 12.0 was used to perform the meta-analysis. Two-thousand one hundred sixty-three articles were obtained after searching databases, and 47 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis. The result of the analysis in random effect model showed that RA group had significantly higher CIMT than control group, with the standardized mean difference (SMD) of 1.04 and 95% CI (0.81,1.27). To evaluate the stability of our results, sensitivity analyses were performed, and the results showed no significant change when any one study was excluded. Subgroup analyses showed that region, race, age, BMI, and disease duration were associated with CIMT in RA patients. In summary, CIMT in RA patients is thicker than healthy controls, and it is influenced by region, race, age, BMI, and disease duration.

Indexed as

Carotid Intima-Media ThicknessArthritis, RheumatoidCarotid ArteriesHumansObservational Studies as TopicCarotid intima-media thicknessMeta-analysisRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID26614535
OpenAlexW2173211289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.