Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26614518›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Progression-free and overall survival in patients with recurrent Glioblastoma multiforme treated with last-line bevacizumab versus bevacizumab/lomustine.

D H Heiland, W Masalha, P Franco, M R Machein, A Weyerbrock

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Radiogenomic-Based Survival Risk Stratification of Tumor Habitat on Gd-T1w MRI Is Associated with Biological Processes in Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Laboratory animal research · 2018
    Article
  20. Therapeutic Immunization against Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D H HeilandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, BreisacherStrasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
W MasalhaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, BreisacherStrasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
P FrancoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, BreisacherStrasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
M R MacheinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, BreisacherStrasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
A WeyerbrockDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, BreisacherStrasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. astrid.weyerbrock@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bevacizumab (BEV) is widely used for treatment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). 1-(2-Chlorethyl)-cyclohexyl-nitrosourea (CCNU, lomustine) monotherapy is an approved chemotherapeutical option for recurrent GBM. Recent evidence demonstrated a survival benefit of combined treatment with BEV and CCNU in patients with a first recurrence of GBM. We examined the outcome of recurrent GBM patients with BEV monotherapy versus BEV/CCNU therapy when used as last-line therapy. 35 patients with recurrent GBM treated between 2010 and 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Progression-free and overall survival was determined with reference to the beginning of BEV or BEV/CCNU therapy and initial diagnosis. 17 patients received BEV monotherapy, 18 patients received combined BEV and CCNU therapy. The impact of parameters such as IDH mutation, MGMT promoter methylation, tumor localization, histology and the number of surgeries were included in a multivariate ANOVA analysis. Furthermore, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), neurological function and toxicity were assessed. BEV/CCNU treatment led to an extension of PFS (6.11 months; 95% CL 3.41-12.98 months; log-rank p = 0.00241) and OS (6.59 months; 95% CL 5.51-16.3 months; log-rank p = 0.0238) of 2 months compared to BEV monotherapy. This survival advantage was independent of histology, IDH mutation status or the number of previous surgeries. Neurological function, KPS and toxicity were not significantly different between both treatment groups. Last-line therapy with BEV/CCNU results in a longer PFS and OS compared to BEV monotherapy and is well-tolerated. These findings confirm the role of these agents in the treatment of recurrent GBM and are in line with other studies.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansLomustineMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateBevacizumabLomustineBevacizumabCCNUGlioblastoma multiformeLast-line therapyTumor recurrence

Identifiers

PMID26614518
OpenAlexW2175619860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.