Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26614112›Full record

ReviewUrolithiasis2016

How should patients with cystine stone disease be evaluated and treated in the twenty-first century?

Kim Hovgaard Andreassen, Katja Venborg Pedersen, Susanne Sloth Osther, Helene Ulrik Jung, Søren Kissow Lildal, Palle Joern Sloth Osther

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urolithiasis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The role of double heterozygotes of SLC3A1 and SLC7A9 in the prevalence of cystine stones.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Structure-activity relationships and pharmacokinetic evaluation of L-cystine diamides as L-cystine crystallization inhibitors for cystinuria.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Pediatric Nephrolithiasis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Can prenatal renal pelvicalyceal echogenic foci support the diagnosis of cystinuria?Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kim Hovgaard AndreassenDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Fredericia, Denmark.
Katja Venborg PedersenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Susanne Sloth OstherDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Fredericia, Denmark.
Helene Ulrik JungDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Fredericia, Denmark.
Søren Kissow LildalDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Fredericia, Denmark.
Palle Joern Sloth OstherDepartment of Urology, Urological Research Centre, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Fredericia, Denmark. palle.joern.osther@rsyd.dk.
University of Southern Denmark · DKLillebaelt Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cystinuria continues to be one of the most challenging stone diseases. During the latest decades our knowledge of the molecular basis of cystinuria has expanded. Today 160 different mutations in the SLC3A1 gene and 116 in the SLC7A9 gene are listed. The full implications of type A, B or AB status are not yet fully understood but may have implications for prognosis, management and treatment. Despite better understanding of the molecular basis of cystinuria the principles of recurrence prevention have remained essentially the same through decades. No curative treatment of cystinuria exists, and patients will have a life long risk of stone formation, repeated surgery, impaired renal function and quality of life. Therapy to reduce stone formation is directed towards lowering urine cystine concentration and increasing cystine solubility. Different molecules that could play a role in promoting nucleation and have a modulating effect on cystine solubility may represent new targets for cystinuria research. Investigation of newer thiol-containing drugs with fewer adverse effects is also warranted. Determining cystine capacity may be an effective tool to monitor the individual patient's response. Compliance in cystinuric patients concerning both dietary and pharmacological intervention is poor. Frequent clinical follow-up visits in dedicated centres seem to improve compliance. Cystinuric patients should be managed in dedicated centres offering the complete range of minimal invasive treatment modalities, enabling a personalized treatment approach in order to reduce risk and morbidity of multiple procedures.

Indexed as

CystineCystinuriaDietGenotypeHumansKidney CalculiLithotripsyPatient CompliancePhenotypeCystineCystinuriaGeneticKidney stonesNephrolithiasisPharmacologic therapyPreventionSurgical therapyUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID26614112
OpenAlexW2173997153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.