Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26613792›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016

Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F amyloid PET tracers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elizabeth Morris, Anastasia Chalkidou, Alexander Hammers, Janet Peacock, Jennifer Summers, Stephen Keevil

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 12 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Comparability of Centiloid values from [Neuroimage. Reports · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. DynamicalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  18. Comparison of Amyloid-PET Analysis Software UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Cutoff SUVR of [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth MorrisKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Anastasia ChalkidouKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. anastasia.chalkidou@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7519-8774
Alexander HammersDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
Janet PeacockKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Jennifer SummersKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Stephen KeevilKing's Technology Evaluation Centre, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging or tissue biomarker evidence has been introduced into the core diagnostic pathway for Alzheimer's disease (AD). PET using (18)F-labelled beta-amyloid PET tracers has shown promise for the early diagnosis of AD. However, most studies included only small numbers of participants and no consensus has been reached as to which radiotracer has the highest diagnostic accuracy. First, we performed a systematic review of the literature published between 1990 and 2014 for studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of florbetaben, florbetapir and flutemetamol in AD. The included studies were analysed using the QUADAS assessment of methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity reported within each study was performed. Pooled values were calculated for each radiotracer and for visual or quantitative analysis by population included. The systematic review identified nine studies eligible for inclusion. There were limited variations in the methods between studies reporting the same radiotracer. The meta-analysis results showed that pooled sensitivity and specificity values were in general high for all tracers. This was confirmed by calculating likelihood ratios. A patient with a positive ratio is much more likely to have AD than a patient with a negative ratio, and vice versa. However, specificity was higher when only patients with AD were compared with healthy controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no marked differences in the diagnostic accuracy of the three beta-amyloid radiotracers. All tracers perform better when used to discriminate between patients with AD and healthy controls. The sensitivity and specificity for quantitative and visual analysis are comparable to those of other imaging or biomarker techniques used to diagnose AD. Further research is required to identify the combination of tests that provides the highest sensitivity and specificity, and to identify the most suitable position for the tracer in the clinical pathway.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseAniline CompoundsBenzothiazolesCase-Control StudiesEthylene GlycolsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsStilbenes4-(N-methylamino)-4'-(2-(2-(2-fluoroethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)stilbeneAniline CompoundsBenzothiazolesEthylene GlycolsflorbetapirflutemetamolRadiopharmaceuticalsStilbenesAlzheimer’s diseaseAmyloidFlorbetabenFlorbetapirFlutemetamolPET

Identifiers

PMID26613792
PMCPMC4700091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.