SynthesisEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016
Diagnostic accuracy of (18)F amyloid PET tracers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 12 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
120 citing papers in PubMed, 12 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer's Disease Biomarkers: A Systematic Review of Findings from Amyloid and Tau Positron Emission Tomography.Journal of neurotrauma · 2025Pooled it
- Thai Guideline for Nuclear Medicine Investigations of Neurocognitive Disorders: Nuclear Medicine Society of Thailand, the Neurological Society of Thailand, and Thai Medical Physicist Society Collaboration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Guideline
- Comparative Diagnostic Performance of Amyloid-β Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease: A Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic value of arterial spin labeling for Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Amyloid-β PET in Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.Brain and behavior · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Generative Adversarial Network-Based Deep Learning Methods for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Monoclonal Antibodies for Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Published and Unpublished Clinical Trials.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Different Neuroimaging Correlates in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Pooled it
- The Amyloid-β Pathway in Alzheimer's Disease.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Ten Years of Research on Automatic Voice and Speech Analysis of People With Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review Article.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Appropriate use criteria for lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid testing in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2018Pooled it
- A Systematic Review and Aggregated Analysis on the Impact of Amyloid PET Brain Imaging on the Diagnosis, Diagnostic Confidence, and Management of Patients being Evaluated for Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2018Pooled it
- Amyloid-β PET Radioligands in Alzheimer's Disease: From Plaque Detection to Biomarker-Guided Patient Stratification and Therapeutic Monitoring.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2026Review
- Technical Optimization Strategies for Amyloid PET Under Challenging Acquisition Conditions: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparability of Centiloid values from [Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- SPECT and PET imaging of Alzheimer's disease revisited: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence-based prediction.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Review
- DynamicalbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Comparison of Amyloid-PET Analysis Software UsingDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cutoff SUVR of [Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Reliability of Automated Amyloid PET Quantification: Real-World Validation of Commercial Tools Against Centiloid Project Method.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Imaging or tissue biomarker evidence has been introduced into the core diagnostic pathway for Alzheimer's disease (AD). PET using (18)F-labelled beta-amyloid PET tracers has shown promise for the early diagnosis of AD. However, most studies included only small numbers of participants and no consensus has been reached as to which radiotracer has the highest diagnostic accuracy. First, we performed a systematic review of the literature published between 1990 and 2014 for studies exploring the diagnostic accuracy of florbetaben, florbetapir and flutemetamol in AD. The included studies were analysed using the QUADAS assessment of methodological quality. A meta-analysis of the sensitivity and specificity reported within each study was performed. Pooled values were calculated for each radiotracer and for visual or quantitative analysis by population included. The systematic review identified nine studies eligible for inclusion. There were limited variations in the methods between studies reporting the same radiotracer. The meta-analysis results showed that pooled sensitivity and specificity values were in general high for all tracers. This was confirmed by calculating likelihood ratios. A patient with a positive ratio is much more likely to have AD than a patient with a negative ratio, and vice versa. However, specificity was higher when only patients with AD were compared with healthy controls. This systematic review and meta-analysis found no marked differences in the diagnostic accuracy of the three beta-amyloid radiotracers. All tracers perform better when used to discriminate between patients with AD and healthy controls. The sensitivity and specificity for quantitative and visual analysis are comparable to those of other imaging or biomarker techniques used to diagnose AD. Further research is required to identify the combination of tests that provides the highest sensitivity and specificity, and to identify the most suitable position for the tracer in the clinical pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.