Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26613780›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2016

Targeted imputation of sequence variants and gene expression profiling identifies twelve candidate genes associated with lactation volume, composition and calving interval in dairy cattle.

Lesley-Ann Raven, Benjamin G Cocks, Kathryn E Kemper, Amanda J Chamberlain, Christy J Vander Jagt, Michael E Goddard, Ben J Hayes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Identification of mutations in porcineFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lesley-Ann RavenBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Benjamin G CocksBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Kathryn E KemperFaculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3052, Australia.
Amanda J ChamberlainBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Christy J Vander JagtBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Michael E GoddardBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia.
Ben J HayesBiosciences Research Division, Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, 5 Ring Road, Bundoora, 3086, Australia. ben.hayes@ecodev.vic.gov.au.
AgriBio · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dairy cattle are an interesting model for gaining insights into the genes responsible for the large variation between and within mammalian species in the protein and fat content of their milk and their milk volume. Large numbers of phenotypes for these traits are available, as well as full genome sequence of key founders of modern dairy cattle populations. In twenty target QTL regions affecting milk production traits, we imputed full genome sequence variant genotypes into a population of 16,721 Holstein and Jersey cattle with excellent phenotypes. Association testing was used to identify variants within each target region, and gene expression data were used to identify possible gene candidates. There was statistical support for imputed sequence variants in or close to BTRC, MGST1, SLC37A1, STAT5A, STAT5B, PAEP, VDR, CSF2RB, MUC1, NCF4, and GHDC associated with milk production, and EPGN for calving interval. Of these candidates, analysis of RNA-Seq data demonstrated that PAEP, VDR, SLC37A1, GHDC, MUC1, CSF2RB, and STAT5A were highly differentially expressed in mammary gland compared to 15 other tissues. For nine of the other target regions, the most significant variants were in non-coding DNA. Genomic predictions in a third dairy breed (Australian Reds) using sequence variants in only these candidate genes were for some traits more accurate than genomic predictions from 632,003 common SNP on the Bovine HD array. The genes identified in this study are interesting candidates for improving milk production in cattle and could be investigated for novel biological mechanisms driving lactation traits in other mammals.

Indexed as

DairyingQuantitative Trait, HeritableQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBreedingCattleChromosome MappingChromosomes, MammalianDietary FatsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLactationMammary Glands, AnimalMicroarray AnalysisMilkDietary Fats

Identifiers

PMID26613780
OpenAlexW2341019050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.