Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26613734›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Interactions between imidazoline I2 receptor ligands and acetaminophen in adult male rats: antinociception and schedule-controlled responding.

Justin N Siemian, Jiuzhou Li, Yanan Zhang, Jun-Xu Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The imidazoline IPsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Pharmacological evaluation of carvacrol anti-migraine potential.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Role of intracellular CaPsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
  9. Imidazoline IPharmacology & therapeutics · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Justin N SiemianDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Jiuzhou LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Binzhou People's Hospital, Binzhou, Shandong Province, China.
Yanan ZhangResearch Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Jun-Xu LiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. junxuli@buffalo.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USBinzhou People's Hospital · CNRTI International · US

Funding

IMIDAZOLINE I2 RECEPTORS AS TARGETS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PAINR01DA034806 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Behavioral effects of methamphetamine & imidazoline I2 receptor ligandsR21DA033426 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI LI, JUN-XU · 2013 to 2014
$464k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034806NIDA NIH HHS R01DA034806NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA033426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRecent evidence suggests that imidazoline I2 receptor ligands are suitable for combination therapy with opioids. Quantitative analysis of I2 receptor ligands combined with non-opioid drugs is necessary for the justification of alternative pain therapies.

objectiveThis study systematically examined the antihyperalgesic and response rate-suppressing effects of selective I2 receptor ligands (2-BFI and phenyzoline) alone and in combination with acetaminophen.

methodsVon Frey and Hargreaves tests were used to examine the antihyperalgesic effects of drugs in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA)-induced inflammatory pain in rats. Food-reinforced schedule-controlled responding was used to assess the rate-suppressing effects of study drugs. Dose-addition and isobolographic analyses were used to assess drug-drug interactions for all assays.

results2-BFI (3.2-17.8 mg/kg, i.p.), phenyzoline (17.8-100 mg/kg, i.p.), and acetaminophen (56-178 mg/kg, i.p.) all dose-dependently produced significant antinociceptive effects. When studied as combinations, 2-BFI and acetaminophen produced infra-additive to additive interactions while phenyzoline and acetaminophen produced additive to supra-additive interactions. The same drug combinations suppressed response rate in a supra-additive manner.

conclusionsQuantitative analysis of the antihyperalgesic and response rate-suppressing effects suggests that I2 receptor ligands are not well suited to combination therapy with acetaminophen.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnimalsArthritis, ExperimentalBenzofuransConditioning, OperantDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsHyperalgesiaImidazolesImidazoline ReceptorsImidazolinesLigandsMalePainPain Measurement2-(2-benzofuranyl)-2-imidazolineAcetaminophenAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticBenzofuransImidazolesImidazoline ReceptorsImidazolinesLigandsphenyzolineAcetaminophenAntinociceptionComplete Freund’s adjuvantDose-addition analysisImidazoline I2 receptorRats

Identifiers

PMID26613734
PMCPMC4752914
OpenAlexW2278984214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.