Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26613587›Full record

ArticleHuman nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)2016

The Conditions Favoring Between-Community Raiding in Chimpanzees, Bonobos, and Human Foragers.

Sagar A Pandit, Gauri R Pradhan, Hennadii Balashov, Carel P Van Schaik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Key individuals catalyse intergroup violence.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sagar A PanditDepartment of Physics, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, ISA2019, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Gauri R PradhanDepartment of Physics, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, ISA2019, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA. gauri@usf.edu.
Hennadii BalashovDepartment of Physics, University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, ISA2019, Tampa, FL, 33620, USA.
Carel P Van SchaikAnthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimpanzees, bonobos, and human foragers share a fission-fusion social system and a mating system of joint male resource defense polygyny. Within-community skew in male strength varies among and within species. In this study, we extend a mathematical model of within-group male coalition formation among primates to derive the conditions for between-community conflicts in the form of raids. We show that the main factor affecting the presence of successful raiding is the likelihood of major discrepancies in party strength, which are set by party size distributions (and thus community size) and the skew in strength. This study confirms the functional similarities between the raiding of chimpanzees and human foragers, and it supports the "imbalance of power" hypothesis for raiding. However, it also proposes two amendments to this model. First, the absence of raiding in bonobos may be attributable more to potential female involvement in defense against raids, which increases the size of defensive coalitions. Second, the model attributes some of the raiding in humans to major contrasts in instantaneous fighting ability created by surprise raids on unarmed victims; it also draws attention to the distinction between minor raids and major raids that involve multiple bands of the same community.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSocial BehaviorAggressionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleHumansMalePan paniscusPan troglodytesBonobosChimpanzeesHuman foragersIntergroup conflictMathematical modelRaidsWarfare

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.