ArticleJournal of clinical & cellular immunology2015
T Cell Dynamic Activation and Functional Analysis in Nanoliter Droplet Microarray.
Article in Journal of clinical & cellular immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- An innovative single-cell approach for phenotyping and functional genotyping of CAR NK cells.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Article
- Probing T-cell activation in nanoliter tumor co-cultures using membrane displacement trap arrays.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2024Article
- Droplets microfluidics platform-A tool for single cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Microphysiological systems for solid tumor immunotherapy: opportunities and challenges.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Review
- Cell pairing for biological analysis in microfluidic devices.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Review
- A Microfluidic Approach for Probing Heterogeneity in Cytotoxic T-Cells by Cell Pairing in Hydrogel Droplets.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Microfluidic T Cell Selection by Cellular Avidity.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
- Rapid video-based deep learning of cognate versus non-cognate T cell-dendritic cell interactions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Hydrogels for Single-Cell Microgel Production: Recent Advances and Applications.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Measuring single-cell protein secretion in immunology: Technologies, advances, and applications.European journal of immunology · 2021Review
- Microfluidics-Based Single-Cell Research for Intercellular Interaction.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- The Promise of Personalized TCR-Based Cellular Immunotherapy for Cancer Patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Quantifying the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors on CD8Cell death & disease · 2020Article
- Droplet-Based Cytotoxicity Assay: Implementation of Time-Efficient Screening of Antitumor Activity of Natural Killer Cells.ACS omega · 2020Article
- How single-cell immunology is benefiting from microfluidic technologies.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Review
- Single-Cell Sequencing of T cell Receptors: A Perspective on the Technological Development and Translational Application.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Microfluidic on-demand droplet generation, storage, retrieval, and merging for single-cell pairing.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Functional TCR T cell screening using single-cell droplet microfluidics.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
- Integrating Immunology and Microfluidics for Single Immune Cell Analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Review
- Dynamic Analysis of Human Natural Killer Cell Response at Single-Cell Resolution in B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveCharacterization of the heterogeneity in immune reactions requires assessing dynamic single cell responses as well as interactions between the various immune cell subsets. Maturation and activation of effector cells is regulated by cell contact-dependent and soluble factor-mediated paracrine signalling. Currently there are few methods available that allow dynamic investigation of both processes simultaneously without physically constraining non-adherent cells and eliminating crosstalk from neighboring cell pairs. We describe here a microfluidic droplet microarray platform that permits rapid functional analysis of single cell responses and co-encapsulation of heterotypic cell pairs, thereby allowing us to evaluate the dynamic activation state of primary T cells.
methodsThe microfluidic droplet platform enables generation and docking of monodisperse nanoliter volume (0.523 nl) droplets, with the capacity of monitoring a thousand droplets per experiment. Single human T cells were encapsulated in droplets and stimulated on-chip with the calcium ionophore ionomycin. T cells were also co-encapsulated with dendritic cells activated by ovalbumin peptide, followed by dynamic calcium signal monitoring.
resultsIonomycin-stimulated cells depicted fluctuation in calcium signalling compared to control. Both cell populations demonstrated marked heterogeneity in responses. Calcium signalling was observed in T cells immediately following contact with DCs, suggesting an early activation signal. T cells further showed non-contact mediated increase in calcium level, although this response was delayed compared to contact-mediated signals.
conclusionsOur results suggest that this nanoliter droplet array-based microfluidic platform is a promising technique for assessment of heterogeneity in various types of cellular responses, detection of early/delayed signalling events and live cell phenotyping of immune cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.