Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26613003›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2015

Single-cell screening of photosynthetic growth and lactate production by cyanobacteria.

Petter Hammar, S Andreas Angermayr, Staffan L Sjostrom, Josefin van der Meer, Klaas J Hellingwerf, Elton P Hudson, Haakan N Joensson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Droplets microfluidics platform-A tool for single cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Droplet Microfluidics for Microbial Biotechnology.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Microfluidic Single-Cell Analytics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Petter HammarScience for Life Laboratory, Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
S Andreas AngermayrSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands ; Institute of Science and Technology (IST) Austria, Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Staffan L SjostromScience for Life Laboratory, Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Josefin van der MeerScience for Life Laboratory, Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klaas J HellingwerfSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elton P HudsonScience for Life Laboratory, Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Haakan N JoenssonScience for Life Laboratory, Division of Proteomics and Nanobiotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden ; Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Science for Life Laboratory · SEKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhotosynthetic cyanobacteria are attractive for a range of biotechnological applications including biofuel production. However, due to slow growth, screening of mutant libraries using microtiter plates is not feasible.

resultsWe present a method for high-throughput, single-cell analysis and sorting of genetically engineered l-lactate-producing strains of Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. A microfluidic device is used to encapsulate single cells in picoliter droplets, assay the droplets for l-lactate production, and sort strains with high productivity. We demonstrate the separation of low- and high-producing reference strains, as well as enrichment of a more productive l-lactate-synthesizing population after UV-induced mutagenesis. The droplet platform also revealed population heterogeneity in photosynthetic growth and lactate production, as well as the presence of metabolically stalled cells.

conclusionsThe workflow will facilitate metabolic engineering and directed evolution studies and will be useful in studies of cyanobacteria biochemistry and physiology.

Indexed as

CyanobacteriaDroplet microfluidicsHigh-throughput screeningLactate dehydrogenaseSingle cell

Identifiers

PMID26613003
PMCPMC4660834
OpenAlexW2172612097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.