Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26612666›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2016

Optogenetics enlightens neuroscience drug discovery.

Chenchen Song, Thomas Knöpfel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Optoelectronic Neural Interfaces Based on Quantum Dots.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Pharmacological plasticity-How do you hit a moving target?Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2019
    Review
  12. Optogenetics: Therapeutic spark in neuropathic pain.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. A unified circuit for social behavior.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2019
    Article
  14. Opportunities and challenges in psychopharmacology
.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  15. Remote control of movement disorders using a photoactive adenosine AJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2018
    Article
  16. The promise and perils of causal circuit manipulations.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. From Engrams to Pathologies of the Brain.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chenchen SongDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.
Thomas KnöpfelDivision of Brain Sciences, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0NN, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optogenetics - the use of light and genetics to manipulate and monitor the activities of defined cell populations - has already had a transformative impact on basic neuroscience research. Now, the conceptual and methodological advances associated with optogenetic approaches are providing fresh momentum to neuroscience drug discovery, particularly in areas that are stalled on the concept of 'fixing the brain chemistry'. Optogenetics is beginning to translate and transit into drug discovery in several key domains, including target discovery, high-throughput screening and novel therapeutic approaches to disease states. Here, we discuss the exciting potential of optogenetic technologies to transform neuroscience drug discovery.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrug DiscoveryHumansNeural PathwaysNeurosciencesOptogeneticsPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID26612666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.