Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26611711›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Differentiating unipolar and bipolar depression by alterations in large-scale brain networks.

Roberto Goya-Maldonado, Katja Brodmann, Maria Keil, Sarah Trost, Peter Dechent, Oliver Gruber

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Effects of Ketamine on Frontoparietal Interactions in a Rule-Based Antisaccade Task in Macaque Monkeys.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Shared and disease-sensitive dysfunction across bipolar and unipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a transdiagnostic study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto Goya-MaldonadoDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Katja BrodmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Maria KeilDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Sarah TrostDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Peter DechentDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, Research Group 'MR-Research in Neurology and Psychiatry', University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
Oliver GruberDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Translational Research in Systems Neuroscience and Psychiatry, University Medical Center, Georg-August-University, Goettingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMisdiagnosing bipolar depression can lead to very deleterious consequences of mistreatment. Although depressive symptoms may be similarly expressed in unipolar and bipolar disorder, changes in specific brain networks could be very distinct, being therefore informative markers for the differential diagnosis. We aimed to characterize specific alterations in candidate large-scale networks (frontoparietal, cingulo-opercular, and default mode) in symptomatic unipolar and bipolar patients using resting state fMRI, a cognitively low demanding paradigm ideal to investigate patients.

methodsNetworks were selected after independent component analysis, compared across 40 patients acutely depressed (20 unipolar, 20 bipolar), and 20 controls well-matched for age, gender, and education levels, and alterations were correlated to clinical parameters.

resultsDespite comparable symptoms, patient groups were robustly differentiated by large-scale network alterations. Differences were driven in bipolar patients by increased functional connectivity in the frontoparietal network, a central executive and externally-oriented network. Conversely, unipolar patients presented increased functional connectivity in the default mode network, an introspective and self-referential network, as much as reduced connectivity of the cingulo-opercular network to default mode regions, a network involved in detecting the need to switch between internally and externally oriented demands. These findings were mostly unaffected by current medication, comorbidity, and structural changes. Moreover, network alterations in unipolar patients were significantly correlated to the number of depressive episodes.

conclusionUnipolar and bipolar groups displaying similar symptomatology could be clearly distinguished by characteristic changes in large-scale networks, encouraging further investigation of network fingerprints for clinical use. Hum Brain Mapp 37:808-818, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultBipolar DisorderBrainBrain MappingDepressive DisorderDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPsychometricsRestcingulo-operculardefault modedepressionfrontoparietalfunctional connectivitylarge-scale networksmood disorders

Identifiers

PMID26611711
PMCPMC6867444
OpenAlexW2173893173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.