Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26611692›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2015

"Men's health--a little in the shadow": a formative evaluation of medical curriculum enhancement with men's health teaching and learning.

Carol A Holden, Veronica R Collins, Christopher J Anderson, Sylvia Pomeroy, Richard Turner, Benedict J Canny, Bu B Yeap, Gary Wittert, Rob I McLachlan

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carol A HoldenAndrology Australia, c/o School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia. carol.holden@monash.edu.
Veronica R CollinsAndrology Australia, c/o School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia. veronica.collins@monash.edu.
Christopher J AndersonAndrology Australia, c/o School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia. christopher.anderson@monash.edu.
Sylvia PomeroySchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia. sylia.pomeroy@monash.edu.
Richard TurnerSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. richard.turner@utas.edu.au.
Benedict J CannyFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. ben.canny@monash.edu.
Bu B YeapSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, and Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Fremantle and Fiona Stanley Hospitals, Perth, WA, Australia. byeap@cyllene.uwa.edu.au.
Gary WittertFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, University of Adelaide and Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. gary.wittert@adelaide.edu.au.
Rob I McLachlanAndrology Australia, c/o School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia. robert.mclachlan@hudson.org.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhancing a medical school curriculum with new men's health teaching and learning requires an understanding of the local capacity and the facilitators and barriers to implementing new content, and an approach that accommodates the systemic and cultural differences between medical schools.

methodsA formative evaluation was undertaken to determine the perspectives of key informants (academics, curriculum developers) from four Australian medical schools about the strategies needed to enhance their curriculum with men's health teaching and learning. Through semi-structured questioning with 17 key informants, interviewees also described the contextual barriers and facilitators to incorporating new topic areas into existing curriculum. Interviews were recorded with consent, transcribed verbatim, and analysed by two researchers to identify key themes.

resultsInterviewees were enthusiastic about incorporating men's health content through a men's health curriculum framework but highlighted the need for systems to assist in identifying gaps in their current curriculum where the men's health topics could be integrated. The student experience was identified as a key driver for men's health teaching and learning. Furthermore, core men's health clinical outcomes needed to be defined and topic areas vertically integrated across the curricula. This would ensure that students were appropriately equipped with the skills and knowledge for subsequent clinical practice in a range of geographical settings. Interviewees consistently suggested that the best implementation strategy is to have someone 'on the ground' to work directly with medical school staff and champion the men's health discipline. Providing mechanisms for sharing knowledge and resources across medical schools was highlighted to facilitate implementation, particularly for those medical schools with limited men's health teaching resources.

conclusionsDespite the unanimous support for men's health teaching and learning, the evaluation highlighted that the student experience must be recognised as paramount when integrating new topic areas into an already packed curriculum. A community of practice, where medical schools share relevant resources and knowledge, could help to ensure a commonality of student experience with respect to men's health learning in medical schools across different geographical settings and with different levels of resourcing. Such an approach could also be adapted to other areas of curriculum enhancement.

Indexed as

CurriculumMen's HealthAustraliaEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFemaleHealth EducationHumansLearningMaleProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSchools, MedicalStudents, MedicalTeachingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26611692
PMCPMC4660688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.