Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26611675›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Genome-wide expression profiles of Pyropia haitanensis in response to osmotic stress by using deep sequencing technology.

Li Wang, Yunxiang Mao, Fanna Kong, Min Cao, Peipei Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metabolic Responses ofMarine drugs · 2025
    Article
  2. Macrophage-enriched novel functional long noncoding RNAs LRRC75A-AS1 and GAPLINC regulate polarization and innate immune responses.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li WangKey Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. liwang@dlnu.edu.cn.
Yunxiang MaoKey Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. yxmao@ouc.edu.cn.
Fanna KongKey Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. fnkong@ouc.edu.cn.
Min CaoKey Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. caominjiayou@163.com.
Peipei SunKey Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding (Ocean University of China), Ministry of Education, College of Marine Life Science, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, China. sunpei0819@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPyropia haitanensis is an economically important marine crop grown in harsh intertidal habitats of southern China; it is also an excellent model system for studying mechanisms of stress tolerance. To understand the molecular mechanisms underlying osmotic tolerance and adaptation to intertidal environments, a comprehensive analysis of genome-wide gene expression profiles in response to dehydration and rehydration in Py. haitanensis was undertaken using digital gene expression profile (DGE) approaches combined with de novo transcriptome sequencing.

resultsRNA-sequencing of the pooled RNA samples from different developmental phases and stress treatments was performed, which generated a total of 47.7 million clean reads. These reads were de novo assembled into 28,536 unigenes (≥ 200 bp), of which 18,217 unigenes (63.83 %) were annotated in at least one reference database. DGE analysis was performed on four treatments (two biological replicates per treatment), which included moderate dehydration, severe dehydration, rehydration, and normal conditions. The number of raw reads per sample ranged from 12.47 to 15.79 million, with an average of 14.69 million reads per sample. After quality filtering, the number of clean reads per sample ranged from 11.83 to 15.04 million. All distinct sequencing reads were annotated using the transcriptome of Py. haitanensis as reference. A total of 1,681 unigenes showed significant differential expression between moderate dehydration and normal conditions, in which 977 genes were upregulated, and 704 genes were downregulated. Between severe dehydration and normal conditions, 1,993 unigenes showed significantly altered expression, which included both upregulated (1,219) and downregulated genes (774). In addition, 1,086 differentially expressed genes were detected between rehydration and normal conditions, of which 720 genes were upregulated and 366 unigenes were downregulated. Most gene expression patterns in response to dehydration differed from that of rehydration, except for the synthesis of unsaturated fatty acids, several transcription factor families, and molecular chaperones that have been collectively implicated in the processes of dehydration and rehydration in Py. haitanensis.

conclusionsTaken together, these data provide a global high-resolution analysis of gene expression changes during osmotic stress that could potentially serve as a key resource for understanding the biology of osmotic acclimation in intertidal red seaweed.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingOsmotic PressureGenome-Wide Association StudyRhodophytaTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID26611675
PMCPMC4661969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.