ArticleThe Lancet. Oncology2016
Effect of continuous deep sedation on survival in patients with advanced cancer (J-Proval): a propensity score-weighted analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Article in The Lancet. Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of the inpatient practice of continuous deep sedation until death on healthcare professionals' emotional well-being: a systematic review.BMC palliative care · 2017Pooled it
- [Austrian guideline for palliative sedation therapy (long version) : Results of a Delphi process of the Austrian Palliative Society (OPG)].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2017Guideline
- Trial
- Double-effect sedation: do physicians not intend a decrease in consciousness when it is caused by drugs that can also reduce specific symptoms?Journal of medical ethics · 2026Article
- Nursing practices in palliative sedation across respiratory medicine wards and palliative care units in Japan: A cross-sectional study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Attitudes and practices of hospice physicians regarding palliative sedation: a cross-sectional descriptive study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Refractory symptoms and end of life midazolam use in cancer patients, a single center experience.Palliative & supportive care · 2025Article
- Palliative sedation rate for noncancer terminally ill patients at home in Japan.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Palliative use of midazolam in acute geriatric units: a multicenter ambispective study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Continuous Sedation in Palliative Care in Portugal: A Prospective Multicentric Study.Journal of palliative care · 2025Article
- [New recommendations on palliative sedation].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Dexmedetomidine Combined With Patient-Controlled Analgesia for Palliative Sedation in Terminal-Stage Cancer Patients With Refractory Pain: A Retrospective Analysis of Nine Cases.Pain research & management · 2024Article
- Observational
- Effect of Dexmedetomidine for Palliative Sedation for Refractory Dyspnoea in Patients with Terminal-Stage Cancer.Cancer management and research · 2023Article
- Current Status and Future Directions of Research on Palliative Sedation.Journal of hospice and palliative care · 2022Article
- Palliative Sedation in End-of-Life Patients in Eastern Asia: A Narrative Review.Cancer research and treatment · 2022Review
- Effect of paracentesis on the survival of patients with terminal cancer and ascites: a propensity score-weighted analysis of the East Asian Collaborative Cross-cultural Study to Elucidate the Dying Process.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Observational
- The quality of palliative sedation in end-stage disease: audit from a department of oncology and haematology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Palliative sedation for children at end of life: a retrospective cohort study.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
21 authors at 16 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous deep sedation (CDS) before death is a form of palliative sedation therapy that has become a focus of strong debate, especially with respect to whether it shortens survival. We aimed to examine whether CDS shortens patient survival using the propensity score-weighting method, and to explore the effect of artificial hydration during CDS on survival.
methodsThis study was a secondary analysis of a large multicentre prospective cohort study that recruited and followed up patients between Sept 3, 2012, and April 30, 2014, from 58 palliative care institutions across Japan, including hospital palliative care settings, inpatient palliative care units, and home-based palliative care services. Adult patients (aged ≥ 20 years) with advanced cancer who received care through the participating palliative care services were eligible for this secondary analysis. Patients with missing data for outcome variables or who lived for more than 180 days were excluded. We compared survival after enrolment between patients who did and did not receive CDS. We used a propensity score-weighting method to control for patient characteristics, disease status, and symptom burden at enrolment.
findingsOf 2426 enrolled patients with advanced cancer, we excluded 289 (12%) for living longer than 180 days and 310 (13%) with missing data, leaving an analysis population of 1827 patients. 269 (15%) of 1827 patients received CDS. Unweighted median survival was 27 days (95% CI 22-30) in the CDS group and 26 days (24-27) in the no CDS group (median difference -1 day [95% CI -5 to 4]; HR 0·92 [95% CI 0·81-1·05]; log-rank p=0·20). After propensity-score weighting, these values were 22 days (95% CI 21-24) and 26 days (24-27), respectively (median difference -1 day [95% CI -6 to 4]; HR 1·01 [95% CI 0·87-1·17]; log-rank p=0·91). Age (p(interaction)=0·67), sex (p(interaction)=0·26), performance status (p(interaction)=0·90), and volume of artificial hydration (p(interaction)=0·14) did not have an effect modification on the association between sedation and survival, although care setting did have a significant effect modification (p(interaction)=0·021).
interpretationCDS does not seem to be associated with a measurable shortening of life in patients with advanced cancer cared for by specialised palliative care services, and could be considered a viable option for palliative care in this setting.
fundingJapanese National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.