Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26610844›Full record

Trial reportMalaria journal2015

Summary of anti-malarial prophylactic efficacy of tafenoquine from three placebo-controlled studies of residents of malaria-endemic countries.

Geoffrey S Dow, Jun Liu, Gina Lin, Brian Hetzell, Sarah Thieling, William F McCarthy, Douglas Tang, Bryan Smith

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05203744 (Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Tafenoquine After Weekly and Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Vietnamese Volunteers), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05203744 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Tafenoquine After Weekly and Escalating Monthly Doses of Tafenoquine in Healthy Vietnamese Volunteers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNaval Medical Research CenterRan2022 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsProphylaxisArmsTafenoquine prophylaxis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tafenoquine for Relapsing Babesiosis: A Case Series.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. 8-Aminoquinoline Therapy for Latent Malaria.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey S Dow60° Pharmaceuticals LLC, Washington, DC, 20036, USA. geoffdow@60degreespharma.com.
Jun LiuPPD, Inc., Richmond, VA, 23230, USA. Jun.Liu@ppdi.com.
Gina LinPPD, Inc., Richmond, VA, 23230, USA. Gina.Lin@ppdi.com.
Brian HetzellPPD, Inc., Richmond, VA, 23230, USA. Brian.Hetzell@ppdi.com.
Sarah ThielingPPD, Inc., Richmond, VA, 23230, USA. Sarah.Thieling@ppdi.com.
William F McCarthyUSAMMDA, Ft Detrick, MD, 21702, USA. william.f.mccarthy1.civ@mail.mil.
Douglas TangUSAMMDA, Ft Detrick, MD, 21702, USA. dtang38@verizon.net.
Bryan SmithUSAMMDA, Ft Detrick, MD, 21702, USA. bryan.l.smith5.mil@mail.mil.
Pharmaceutical Product Development (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTafenoquine is a long half-life primaquine analog being developed for malaria prophylaxis. The US Army recently performed a unified analysis of efficacy in preparation for a regulatory submission, utilizing legacy data from three placebo-controlled studies conducted in the late 1990s and early 2000s. The subjects were residents of Africa who were naturally exposed to Plasmodium falciparum for 12-26 weeks.

methodsThe prophylactic efficacy of tafenoquine and mefloquine (included in some studies as a comparator) was calculated using incidence density among subjects who had completed the three-day loading doses of study drug, had at least one maintenance dose and had at least one blood smear assessed during the prophylactic period. The three placebo-controlled studies were analysed separately and then in two pooled analyses: one for tafenoquine versus placebo (three studies) and one for tafenoquine and mefloquine versus placebo (two studies).

resultsThe pooled protective efficacy (PE) of a tafenoquine regimen with three daily loading doses plus weekly maintenance at 200-mg for 10 weeks or longer (referred to as 200-mg weekly hereafter) relative to placebo in three placebo-controlled studies was 93.1 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 89.1-95.6 %; total N = 492]. The pooled PEs of regimens of tafenoquine 200-mg weekly and mefloquine 250-mg weekly relative to placebo in two placebo-controlled studies (total N = 519) were 93.5 % (95 % CI 88.6-96.2 %) and 94.5 % (95 % CI 88.7-97.3 %), respectively. Three daily loading plus weekly maintenance doses of 50- and 100-mg, but not 25-mg, exhibited similar PEs. The PEs of tafenoquine regimens of a three-day loading dose at 400-mg with and without follow-up weekly maintenance doses at 400-mg were 93.7 % (95 % CI 85.4-97.3 %) and 81.0 % (95 % CI 66.8-89.1 %), respectively.

conclusionsTafenoquine provided the same level of prophylactic efficacy as mefloquine in residents of Africa. These data support the prophylactic efficacy of tafenoquine and mefloquine that has already been demonstrated in the intended malaria naive population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAminoquinolinesAntimalarialsChemopreventionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMalaria, FalciparumMaleMefloquineMiddle AgedPlacebosTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAminoquinolinesAntimalarialsMefloquinePlacebostafenoquine

Identifiers

PMID26610844
PMCPMC4661991
OpenAlexW2174234767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.