Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26610756›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Obesity in pregnancy: infant health service utilisation and costs on the NHS.

Kelly L Morgan, Muhammad A Rahman, Rebecca A Hill, Ashrafunnesa Khanom, Ronan A Lyons, Sinead T Brophy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Maternal health and non-communicable disease prevention: An investment case for the post COVID-19 world and need for better health economic data.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly L MorganCentre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Muhammad A RahmanThe Farr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Rebecca A HillThe Farr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ashrafunnesa KhanomThe Farr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Ronan A LyonsThe Farr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Sinead T BrophyThe Farr Institute, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Swansea University · GBFarr Institute · GBCardiff University · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1Medical Research Council MR/K023233/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the direct healthcare cost of infants born to overweight or obese mothers to the National Health Service in the UK.

designRetrospective prevalence-based study.

settingCombined linked anonymised electronic data sets on a cohort of mother-child pairs enrolled on the Growing Up in Wales: Environments for Healthy Living (EHL) study. Infants were categorised according to maternal early-pregnancy body mass index (BMI): healthy weight mother (18.5≤BMI<25 kg/m(2); n=342), overweight mother (25≤BMI≤29.9 kg/m(2); n=157) and obese mother (BMI≥30; n=110).

participants609 singleton pregnancies with available health service records and an antenatal maternal BMI. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Total health service utilisation and direct healthcare costs for providing these services in the year 2012-2013. Costs are calculated as cost of the infant (no maternal costs considered) and are related to health service usage from birth to age 1 year.

resultsA strong association existed between healthcare usage cost and BMI (p<0.001). Mean total costs were 72% higher among children born to obese mothers (rate ratio (RR) 1.72, 95% CI 1.71 to 1.73) compared with infants born to healthy weight mothers. Higher costings were attributed to a significantly greater number (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.84) and duration (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.74) of inpatient visits and a higher number of general practitioner visits (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.16). Total mean additional resource cost was estimated at £65.13 for infants born to overweight mothers and £1138.11 for infants born to obese mothers, when compared with infants of healthy weight mothers.

conclusionsIncreasingly infants born to mothers with high BMIs consume additional health service resources in the first year of life; this was apparent across inpatient and general practitioner services. Considering both maternal and infant health service use, interventions that cost less than £2310 per person in reducing obesity early pregnancy could be cost-effective.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleHealth Care CostsHumansInfantMaleMaternal-Child Health ServicesObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTerm BirthHEALTH ECONOMICSPAEDIATRICSPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26610756
PMCPMC4663437
OpenAlexW2177978171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.