ArticleBMJ open2015
Visual and refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: 1-year follow-up.
Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Multicenter Study on Early Outcomes of Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction for Myopia.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- The clinical outcomes of lamellar keratomileusis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus positivity.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Reversal of Myopic Correction for Patients Intolerant to LASIK.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Comparison Between the Effect of Femtosecond Laser in situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) and Femtosecond Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (FS-SMILE) on the Corneal Endothelium.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Observational
- Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4 mm versus 1.0 mm.Journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Four-year observation of predictability and stability of small incision lenticule extraction.BMC ophthalmology · 2016Observational
- Femtosecond-laser-assisted Small Incision Lenticule Extraction to Treat Refractive Error: A Narrative Review.Middle East African journal of ophthalmologyReview
- Future Developments in SMILE: Higher Degree of Myopia and Hyperopia.Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the 1 year clinical outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism using a 500 kHz femtosecond laser system.
methodsThis prospective study evaluated 52 eyes of 39 consecutive patients (31.8±6.9 years, mean age±SD) with spherical equivalents of -4.11±1.73 D (range, -1.25 to -8.25 D) who underwent SMILE for myopia and myopic astigmatism. Preoperatively, 1 week, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, we assessed the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, corneal endothelial cell loss and the adverse events of the surgery.
resultsThe logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected distance visual acuity and LogMAR corrected distance visual acuity were -0.16±0.11 and -0.22±0.07, respectively, 1 year postoperatively. At 1 year, all eyes were within±0.5 D of the targeted correction. Manifest refraction changes of -0.05±0.32 D occurred from 1 week to 1 year postoperatively (p=0.20, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The endothelial cell density was not significantly changed from 2804±267 cells/mm(2) preoperatively to 2743±308 cells/mm(2) 1 year postoperatively (p=0.12). No vision-threatening complications occurred during the observation period.
conclusionsSMILE performed well in the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism, and no significant change in endothelial cell density or any other serious complications occurred throughout the 1-year follow-up period, suggesting its viability as a surgical option for the treatment of such eyes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.