Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26610697›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta during vaginal birth: a systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis.

Ezinne C Chibueze, Alexander J Q Parsons, Erika Ota, Toshiyuki Swa, Olufemi T Oladapo, Rintaro Mori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03459599 (Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Ragged Placental Membranes), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03459599 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Ragged Placental Membranes: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSarawak General HospitalRan2016 to 2017Enrolled716ConditionsEndometritis Postpartum, Endometritis, Membranes, RetainedArmsProphylactic antibiotics, No prophylaxis (Amox-clav withheld)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Retained placenta after vaginal delivery: risk factors and management.International journal of women's health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ezinne C ChibuezeDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 10-1-2 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. ruthwavy22@gmail.com.
Alexander J Q ParsonsDepartment of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. ajqparsons@gmail.com.
Erika OtaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 10-1-2 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. ota-e@ncchd.go.jp.
Toshiyuki SwaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 10-1-2 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. mktb@tcct.zaq.ne.jp.
Olufemi T OladapoDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, including UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. oladapoo@who.int.
Rintaro MoriDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, 10-1-2 Okura, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, 157-8535, Japan. mori-r@ncchd.go.jp.
National Center For Child Health and Development · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManual removal of the placenta is an invasive obstetric procedure commonly used for the management of retained placenta. However, it is unclear whether antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing infectious morbidity. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of routine use of antibiotics for preventing adverse maternal outcomes related to manual placenta removal following vaginal birth.

methodsA detailed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and the CINAHL databases was conducted for non-randomized studies involving women undergoing manual placenta delivery after vaginal births and where antibiotic prophylaxis use was compared with no treatment or placebo to prevent maternal infection. Search terms including 'delivery, obstetric', 'placenta, retained', 'anti-infective agents', and 'chemoprevention' were used.

resultsOf the 407 citations that resulted after elimination of duplicates, 81 full texts were potentially eligible after independent assessment of the title and abstracts. Independent review of the full texts identified three eligible cohort studies which were retrospective in design. These studies contained data on two of the pre-specified outcomes, endometritis and puerperal fever. Other secondary outcomes such as perineal infection and/or any infection, hospital stay duration, sepsis, hemorrhage >1000 ml or hospital readmissions were not reported on excluding puerperal fever. A meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in the incidence of endometritis (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 1.85, three studies, 567 women) and puerperal fever (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.27, one study, 302 women).

conclusionsThere is currently no evidence to suggest beneficial effects for routine antibiotic use in women undergoing manual placental removal following vaginal birth. In appropriate settings, further research is required to determine whether a policy of routine antibiotic prophylaxis for the procedure should be maintained or discouraged.

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisAnti-Bacterial AgentsDelivery, ObstetricEndometritisFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPlacenta, RetainedPregnancyPuerperal InfectionRetrospective StudiesSurgical Wound InfectionAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID26610697
PMCPMC4661978
OpenAlexW2185206403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.