Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26610339›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Diagnosis of spacer-associated infection using quantitative cultures from sonicated antibiotics-loaded spacers: implications for the clinical outcome.

J Esteban, I Gadea, C Pérez-Jorge, E Sandoval, J García-Cañete, R Fernandez-Roblas, A Blanco, L Prieto-Borja, J Cordero-Ampuero

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biofilm · 2023
    Article
  3. World journal of orthopedics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. [Treatment of periprosthetic infections].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J EstebanDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain. jestebanmoreno@gmail.com.
I GadeaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
C Pérez-JorgeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
E SandovalDepartment of Orthopaedics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
J García-CañeteDepartment of Internal Medicine-Emergencies, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
R Fernandez-RoblasDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
A BlancoDepartment of Internal Medicine-Emergencies, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
L Prieto-BorjaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz, UAM, Av. Reyes Católicos 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
J Cordero-AmpueroDepartment of Orthopaedics, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showed that a positive microbiological result from sonication of the PMMA spacer was associated with poor outcome of patients, but no quantitative analysis has yet been performed. For this purpose, a prospective analysis of 50 spacers (46 patients) was performed. All spacers were processed according to a previously described protocol, including centrifugation and quantitative culture. Clinical data and outcome were also analysed. A statistical relationship between the results of the cultures and the outcome of the patient was assessed. Sixteen patients were diagnosed with spacer-associated infection. Thirteen out of 50 spacers gave a positive culture. Nine of 13 presented with growth of an organism not isolated in the first-stage cultures, and in 7 out of 13 the organisms count was high (>10,000 CFU/ml). We have detected a significant statistical relationship between poor outcome and positive cultures, high colony counts, isolation of different organisms, positive periprosthetic cultures and spacer-associated infection. The detection in a sonicated, antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacer of organisms other than those isolated in the first surgical samples or high colony counts of any organisms is diagnostic with regard to spacer-associated infection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsArthroplasty, Replacement, ElbowArthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBacterial Typing TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProsthesis-Related InfectionsSonicationTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.