Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26610337›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2016

Microbial biofilms associated with intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections in adult intensive care patients.

L Zhang, J Gowardman, M Morrison, N Runnegar, C M Rickard

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L ZhangAVATAR Group, Research Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, N48 Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan QLD, 4111, Brisbane, Australia. li.zhang@griffith.edu.au.
J GowardmanAVATAR Group, Research Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, N48 Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan QLD, 4111, Brisbane, Australia.
M MorrisonThe University of Queensland Diamantina Institute, Translational Research Institute, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, Australia.
N RunnegarInfection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
C M RickardAVATAR Group, Research Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, N48 Nathan Campus, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan QLD, 4111, Brisbane, Australia.
Griffith University · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is one of the most serious complications in hospitalised patients, leading to increased hospitalisation, intensive care admissions, extensive antibiotic treatment and mortality. A greater understanding of these bacterial infections is needed to improve the prevention and the management of CRBSIs. We describe here the systematic culture-independent evaluation of intravascular catheter (IVC) bacteriology. Twelve IVCs (6 central venous catheters and 6 arterial catheters) were collected from 6 patients. By using traditional culture methods, 3 patients were diagnosed with catheter colonisation including 1 patient who also had CRBSI, and 3 had no colonisation. From a total of 839,539 high-quality sequence reads from high-throughput sequencing, 8 microbial phyla and 76 diverse microbial genera were detected. All IVCs examined in this study were colonised with complex microbial communities including "non-colonised IVCs," as defined using traditional culture methods. Two main community types were observed: Enterobacteriaceae spp., dominant in patients without colonisation or CRBSI; and Staphylococcus spp., dominant in patients with colonisation and CRBSI. More diverse pathogens and a higher microbial diversity were present in patients with IVC colonisation and CRBSI. Community composition did not appear to be affected by patients' antibiotic treatment or IVC type. Characterisation of these communities is the first step in elucidating roles of these pathogens in disease progression, and to ultimately facilitate the improved prevention, refined diagnosis and management of CRBSI.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBiofilmsCatheterization, PeripheralCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersCritical CareCross InfectionEnterobacteriaceaeHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStaphylococcusAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID26610337
OpenAlexW2178017283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.