ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2016
Characterizing a partially ordered miniprotein through folding molecular dynamics simulations: Comparison with the experimental data.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Curious Case of A31P, a Topology-Switching Mutant of the Repressor of Primer Protein: A Molecular Dynamics Study of Its Folding and Misfolding.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Hypervariability of accessible and inaccessible conformational space of proteins.Current research in structural biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Folding Molecular Dynamics Simulation of a gp41-Derived Peptide Reconcile Divergent Structure Determinations.ACS omega · 2018Article
- CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins.Nature methods · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The villin headpiece helical subdomain (HP36) is one of the best known model systems for computational studies of fast-folding all-α miniproteins. HP21 is a peptide fragment-derived from HP36-comprising only the first and second helices of the full domain. Experimental studies showed that although HP21 is mostly unfolded in solution, it does maintain some persistent native-like structure as indicated by the analysis of NMR-derived chemical shifts. Here we compare the experimental data for HP21 with the results obtained from a 15-μs long folding molecular dynamics simulation performed in explicit water and with full electrostatics. We find that the simulation is in good agreement with the experiment and faithfully reproduces the major experimental findings, namely that (a) HP21 is disordered in solution with <10% of the trajectory corresponding to transiently stable structures, (b) the most highly populated conformer is a native-like structure with an RMSD from the corresponding portion of the HP36 crystal structure of <1 Å, (c) the simulation-derived chemical shifts-over the whole length of the trajectory-are in reasonable agreement with the experiment giving reduced χ(2) values of 1.6, 1.4, and 0.8 for the Δδ(13) C(α) , Δδ(13) CO, and Δδ(13) C(β) secondary shifts, respectively (becoming 0.8, 0.7, and 0.3 when only the major peptide conformer is considered), and finally, (d) the secondary structure propensity scores are in very good agreement with the experiment and clearly indicate the higher stability of the first helix. We conclude that folding molecular dynamics simulations can be a useful tool for the structural characterization of even marginally stable peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.