Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26609493›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2015

Role of "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A in breast oncogenesis: how does it work?

Pradip De, Jennifer H Carlson, Brian Leyland-Jones, Nandini Dey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pradip DeDepartment of Molecular & Experimental Medicine, Avera Research Institute Sioux Falls, SD, USA ; Department of Internal Medicine, SSOM, USD Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Jennifer H CarlsonDepartment of Molecular & Experimental Medicine, Avera Research Institute Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Brian Leyland-JonesDepartment of Molecular & Experimental Medicine, Avera Research Institute Sioux Falls, SD, USA ; Department of Internal Medicine, SSOM, USD Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Nandini DeyDepartment of Molecular & Experimental Medicine, Avera Research Institute Sioux Falls, SD, USA ; Department of Internal Medicine, SSOM, USD Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
University of Sioux Falls · USAvera Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CIP2A gene is an oncogene associated with solid and hematologic malignancies [1]. CIP2A protein is an oncoprotein and a potential cancer therapy target [2]. Literature shows that CIP2A inhibits the tumor suppressor protein PP2A [3] which downregulates phophorylation of AKT, a hallmark of cancers [4] and stabilizes the proto-oncogene, c-MYC in tumor cells [5], the comprehensive action of CIP2A and its functional interaction(s) with other oncoproteins and tumor suppressors is not clearly established. Recently we tried to put forward a contextual mode-of-action of CIP2A protein in a review which proposed that CIP2A influences oncogenesis via an "oncogenic nexus" [1]. In this review we critically evaluated the potential relevance of the mode-of-action of the "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A in breast carcinogenesis and appraised the role of this nexus in different PAM50 luminal A, PAM50 luminal B, PAM50 HER2-enriched and PAM50 basal BC. This review has a novel approach. Here we have not only compiled and discussed the latest developments in this field but also presented data obtained from c-BioPortal and STRING10 in order to substantiate our view regarding the mode-of-action of the "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A. We functionally correlated alterations of genes pertaining to the "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A with protein-protein interactions between the different components of the nexus including (1) subunits of PP2A, (2) multiple transcription factors including MYC oncogene and (3) components of the PI3K-mTOR and the MAPK-ERK oncogenic pathways. Using these proteins as "input" to STRING10 we studied the association, Action view, at the highest Confidence level. OncoPrints (c-BioPortal) showed alterations (%) of regulatory subunits genes of PP2A (PPP2R1A and PPP2R1B) along with alterations of CIP2A in breast invasive carcinoma (TCGA, Nature 2012 & TCGA, Provisional). Similar genetic alterations of PP2A were also observed in samples of breast tumors at our Avera Research Institute, SD. In an attempt to critically evaluate the role of "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A in subtypes of BC, we used PPP2R1A and PPP2R1B as "inputs" into the STRING10 and obtained their predicted association (Action view) in respect to CIP2A. The outcome of this exercise has been discussed in the light of the literature in the BC research in the context of "oncogenic nexus" of CIP2A. In summary, herein we review the progress in our understanding of how CIP2A regulates oncogenic transformations of breast cells via PP2A-CIP2A "oncogenic nexus" and how we can prospect the clinical relevance of CIP2A in the context of BC.

Indexed as

biomarkersbreast tumorsCIP2Ac-MYCPP2Aprognosis

Identifiers

PMID26609493
PMCPMC4633914
OpenAlexW2416535591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.