Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26609445›Full record

ArticleArab journal of urology2015

Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience.

Muhammad Farhan, Syed M Nazim, Basit Salam, M Hammad Ather

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arab journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05201599 (Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05201599 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure(FURL-ICP): a Multicenter, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuohua ZengRan2021 to 2022Enrolled449ConditionsUrinary CalculiArmsFlexible ureteroscope with intelligent control of renal pelvic pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad FarhanSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syed M NazimSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Basit SalamDepartment of Radiology, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
M Hammad AtherSection of Urology, Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the prediction of stone clearance and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score, assessing stone size, tract length (skin-to-stone distance), degree of obstruction, number of calyces involved and stone essence (density). PATIENTS AND

methodsThis was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-tract PCNL while prone, conducted at a university hospital. All patients had non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 weeks of the procedure. Only patients with a unilateral procedure and radio-opaque stones were included. The five variables of the STONE nephrolithometry score were calculated before the procedure. The stone-free rates were assessed with a plain abdominal film at 4 weeks and complications were graded using the modified Clavien system.

resultsIn all, 107 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 80% of patients were rendered stone-free. Among the individual variables, a larger stone (P = 0.002) and the involvement of multiple calyces (P = 0.04) were associated with residual stones, while tract length (skin-to-stone distance), stone density and presence of hydronephrosis were not. Patients who were rendered stone-free had a statistically significant lower overall STONE score than those with residual stones, at 7.24 vs. 8.14 (P = 0.02). The score also correlated with operative duration, which was significantly longer with a higher STONE score (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 18% and most complications were Clavien grade 2, with bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (11 patients) being the commonest. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery, but there was no correlation between the STONE score and complications.

conclusionThe STONE nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with PCNL.

Indexed as

BMI, body mass indexCROES, Clinical Research Office of the Endo-Urological SocietyNCECT, non-contrast-enhanced CTOutcomePCNL, percutaneous nephrolithotomyPercutaneous nephrolithotomyScoring systemSFR, stone-free rateUrolithiasis

Identifiers

PMID26609445
PMCPMC4656797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.