ArticleArab journal of urology2015
Prospective evaluation of outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score: A single-centre experience.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05201599 (Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Stones With a Diameter≤2cm by Flexible Ureteroscope With Intelligent Control of Renal Pelvic Pressure(FURL-ICP): a Multicenter, Parallel, Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predicting the stone-free status post percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis of machine learning models.Urolithiasis · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical study of the postural drainage lithotripsy system for the treatment of residual fragments after retrograde intrarenal surgery.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Review
- Article
- Comparison of STONE, Guy's Stone, and Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity (S-ReSC) Scoring Systems for PCNL Monotherapy in Staghorn Stones.Urology research & practice · 2025Article
- Investigating the effects of tilting the postural drainage lithotripsy system on cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, heart rate, and blood pressure.World journal of urology · 2024Article
- Article
- Stone-scoring systems for predicting complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review of the literature.Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Effects of severe hydronephrosis on surgical outcomes of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL).Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2023Article
- Predicting the outcome of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy using STONE nephrolithometry score-a single-center experience.Urolithiasis · 2022Observational
- Article
- Article
- External validation and comparison of the scoring systems (S.T.O.N.E, GUY, CROES, S-ReSC) for predicting percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes for staghorn stones: A single center experience with 160 cases.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2017Article
- Article
- Article
- Clinical comparison of the efficiency and security of balloon dilators versus fascial dilators in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL).Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the prediction of stone clearance and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) using the 'STONE' nephrolithometry score, assessing stone size, tract length (skin-to-stone distance), degree of obstruction, number of calyces involved and stone essence (density). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a prospective study of patients undergoing single-tract PCNL while prone, conducted at a university hospital. All patients had non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography within 3 weeks of the procedure. Only patients with a unilateral procedure and radio-opaque stones were included. The five variables of the STONE nephrolithometry score were calculated before the procedure. The stone-free rates were assessed with a plain abdominal film at 4 weeks and complications were graded using the modified Clavien system.
resultsIn all, 107 patients were included in the final analysis. Overall, 80% of patients were rendered stone-free. Among the individual variables, a larger stone (P = 0.002) and the involvement of multiple calyces (P = 0.04) were associated with residual stones, while tract length (skin-to-stone distance), stone density and presence of hydronephrosis were not. Patients who were rendered stone-free had a statistically significant lower overall STONE score than those with residual stones, at 7.24 vs. 8.14 (P = 0.02). The score also correlated with operative duration, which was significantly longer with a higher STONE score (P = 0.03). The complication rate was 18% and most complications were Clavien grade 2, with bleeding requiring a blood transfusion (11 patients) being the commonest. There were no deaths within 30 days of surgery, but there was no correlation between the STONE score and complications.
conclusionThe STONE nephrolithometry score is a simple and easy to apply system for predicting complexity in stone clearance with PCNL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.