Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26609287›Full record

ReviewGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2015

The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.

Stefanie C Hautz, Wolf E Hautz, Niklas Keller, Markus A Feufel, Claudia Spies

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stefanie C HautzInstitut für Medizinische Lehre, Abteilung für Assessment und Evaluation, Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Bern, Switzerland ; Klinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité, Campus Mitte und Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.
Wolf E HautzUniversitäres Notfallzentrum, Inselspital Bern, Switzerland.
Niklas KellerKlinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité, Campus Mitte und Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany ; Prodekanat für Studium und Lehre, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Markus A FeufelProdekanat für Studium und Lehre, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany ; Max Planck Institut für Bildungsforschung, Harding Zentrum für Risikokompetenz, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpiesKlinik für Anästhesiologie mit Schwerpunkt operative Intensivmedizin, Charité, Campus Mitte und Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Germany, a national competence based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM) was developed by the Society for Medical Education and the Council of Medical Faculties. As many of its international counterparts the NKLM describes the qualifications of medical school graduates. The definition of such outcome frameworks indents to make medical education transparent to students, teachers and society. The NKLM aims to amend existing lists of medical topics for assessment with learnable competencies. All outcome frameworks are structured into chapters, domains or physician roles. The definition of the scholar-role poses a number of questions such as: What distinguishes necessary qualifications of a scientifically qualified physician from those of a medical scientist?

methods13 outcome frameworks were identified through a systematic three-step literature review and their content compared to the scholar role in the NKLM by means of a qualitative text analysis. The three steps consist of (1) search for outcome frameworks, (2) in- and exclusion, and (3) data extraction, categorization, and validation. The results were afterwards matched with the scholar role of the NKLM.

resultsExtracted contents of all frameworks may be summarized into the components Common Basics, Clinical Application, Research, Teaching and Education, and Lifelong Learning. Compared to the included frameworks the NKLM emphasises competencies necessary for research and teaching while clinical application is less prominently mentioned.

conclusionThe scholar role of the NKLM differs from other international outcome frameworks. Discussing these results shall increase propagation and understanding of the NKLM and thus contribute to the qualification of future medical graduates in Germany.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, UndergraduateGermanyHumansLearningTeachingmedical educationscholarshipundergraduate education

Identifiers

PMID26609287
PMCPMC4645747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.