ReviewGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2015
The scholar role in the National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) compared to other international frameworks.
Review in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competencies for medical nutritional counselling of children and adolescents: Analysis of NKLM 2.0 based on an evidence-based catalogue of criteria.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Preparing medical students to incorporate scientific evidence into patient care: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Undergraduate scientific education and the decline of postgraduate medical researchers in Germany? A perspective discussion and review of the literature.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Action competence in obstetric emergencies-can this be achieved via e-learning? Interprofessional blended learning module on diagnostics and emergency treatment of shoulder dystocia.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- [Project report on fostering scientific competencies in pain medicine in the context of student education].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- Piloting an Innovative Concept of e-Mental Health and mHealth Workshops With Medical Students Using a Participatory Co-design Approach and App Prototyping: Case Study.JMIR medical education · 2022Article
- Studies on acceptance, evaluation and impact of the Cologne program "Research and Medical Studies".GMS journal for medical education · 2020Article
- Intrinsic roles in the crosshair - strategic analysis of multi-site role implementation with an adapted matrix map approach.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- [Cross-sectional field pain medicine Q14 - the Mainz model : Development of the pain medicine curriculum in the standard study course at the University Medical School of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- The inventory as a core element in the further development of the science curriculum in the Mannheim Reformed Curriculum of Medicine.GMS journal for medical education · 2017Article
- The future of practical skills in undergraduate medical education - an explorative Delphi-Study.GMS journal for medical education · 2016Article
- Awareness of ethical issues in medical education: an interactive teach-the-teacher course.GMS journal for medical education · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, a national competence based catalogue of learning objectives in medicine (NKLM) was developed by the Society for Medical Education and the Council of Medical Faculties. As many of its international counterparts the NKLM describes the qualifications of medical school graduates. The definition of such outcome frameworks indents to make medical education transparent to students, teachers and society. The NKLM aims to amend existing lists of medical topics for assessment with learnable competencies. All outcome frameworks are structured into chapters, domains or physician roles. The definition of the scholar-role poses a number of questions such as: What distinguishes necessary qualifications of a scientifically qualified physician from those of a medical scientist?
methods13 outcome frameworks were identified through a systematic three-step literature review and their content compared to the scholar role in the NKLM by means of a qualitative text analysis. The three steps consist of (1) search for outcome frameworks, (2) in- and exclusion, and (3) data extraction, categorization, and validation. The results were afterwards matched with the scholar role of the NKLM.
resultsExtracted contents of all frameworks may be summarized into the components Common Basics, Clinical Application, Research, Teaching and Education, and Lifelong Learning. Compared to the included frameworks the NKLM emphasises competencies necessary for research and teaching while clinical application is less prominently mentioned.
conclusionThe scholar role of the NKLM differs from other international outcome frameworks. Discussing these results shall increase propagation and understanding of the NKLM and thus contribute to the qualification of future medical graduates in Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.