ArticleLasers in medical science2016
Metabolic activity of odontoblast-like cells irradiated with blue LED (455 nm).
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blue light emitting diodes (LEDs) are frequently used in dentistry for light activation of resin-based materials; however, their photobiostimulatory effects have not yet been fully investigated. This study aimed to investigate the effect of blue LED (455 nm) on the metabolism of odontoblast-like cells MDPC-23. Energy doses of 2 and 4 J/cm(2) were used at 20 mW/cm(2) fixed power density. MDPC-23 cells were seeded at 10,000 cells/cm(2) density in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). After 12 h, the culture medium was replaced with new DMEM supplemented with 0.5 % of FBS, and the cells were incubated for further 12 h. After that, single irradiation was performed to the culture, under selected parameters. Cell viability evaluations (Alamar Blue Assay, n = 12), number of viable cells (Trypan Blue Assay, n = 12), morphological analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, n = 2), gene expression (n = 6) of alkaline phosphatase (Alp), collagen (Col-1a1), and dental matrix protein (Dmp-1) (quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)) were performed 72 h after irradiation. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, and Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Direct light application at 4 J/cm(2) energy dose had no negative effects on cell viability, while irradiation with 2 J/cm(2) reduced cell metabolism. None of doses affected the number of viable cells compared with the control group. The two energy doses downregulated the expression of Alp; however, expression of Col-1a1 and Dmp-1 had no alteration. Cells presented change in the cytoskeleton only when irradiated with 2 J/cm(2). In conclusion, the blue LED (455 nm) irradiation, under the evaluated parameters, had no biostimulatory effects on MDPC-23 cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.