ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016
Experimental considerations for fast kurtosis imaging.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Neuropsychology review · 2023Pooled it
- Pathogenic O-GlcNAc dyshomeostasis is associated with cortical malformations and hyperactivity.eLife · 2026Article
- Geometry of the cumulant series in diffusion MRI.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Linear rotationally invariant kurtosis measures from double diffusion encoding MRI.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2025Article
- Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM diffusion study group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 1: In vivo small-animal imaging.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Review
- Somatosensory-evoked response induces extensive diffusivity and kurtosis changes associated with neural activity in rodents.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Detection of recurrent high-grade glioma using microstructure characteristics of distinct metabolic compartments in a multimodal and integrative 18F-FET PET/fast-DKI approach.European radiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of two types of microscopic diffusion anisotropy in mouse brain.NMR in biomedicine · 2023Article
- Optimization of quasi-diffusion magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative accuracy and time-efficient acquisition.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2022Article
- Altered Cerebral Microstructure in Adults With Atrial Septal Defect and Ventricular Septal Defect Repaired in Childhood.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Observational
- Diffusional kurtosis imaging as a possible prognostic marker of cervical incomplete spinal cord injury outcome: a prospective pilot study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Article
- Cortical diffusion kurtosis imaging and thalamic volume are associated with cognitive and walking performance in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2021Article
- Feasibility of generalised diffusion kurtosis imaging approach for brain glioma grading.Neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Rapid microstructural plasticity in the cortical semantic network following a short language learning session.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- Neuroanatomical underpinning of diffusion kurtosis measurements in the cerebral cortex of healthy macaque brains.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- A Fast Protocol for Multiparametric Characterisation of Diffusion in the Brain and Brain Tumours.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Visualization of live, mammalian neurons during Kainate-infusion using magnetic resonance microscopy.NeuroImage · 2020Article
- Tensor-valued diffusion MRI in under 3 minutes: an initial survey of microscopic anisotropy and tissue heterogeneity in intracranial tumors.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe clinical use of kurtosis imaging is impeded by long acquisitions and postprocessing. Recently, estimation of mean kurtosis tensor W¯ and mean diffusivity ( D¯) was made possible from 13 distinct diffusion weighted MRI acquisitions (the 1-3-9 protocol) with simple postprocessing. Here, we analyze the effects of noise and nonideal diffusion encoding, and propose a new correction strategy. We also present a 1-9-9 protocol with increased robustness to experimental imperfections and minimal additional scan time. This refinement does not affect computation time and also provides a fast estimate of fractional anisotropy (FA). THEORY AND
methods1-3-9/1-9-9 data are acquired in rat and human brains, and estimates of D¯, FA, W¯ from human brains are compared with traditional estimates from an extensive diffusion kurtosis imaging data set. Simulations are used to evaluate the influence of noise and diffusion encodings deviating from the scheme, and the performance of the correction strategy. Optimal b-values are determined from simulations and data.
resultsAccuracy and precision in D¯ and W¯ are comparable to nonlinear least squares estimation, and is improved with the 1-9-9 protocol. The compensation strategy vastly improves parameter estimation in nonideal data.
conclusionThe framework offers a robust and compact method for estimating several diffusion metrics. The protocol is easily implemented. Magn Reson Med 76:1455-1468, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.