Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608731›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2016

Experimental considerations for fast kurtosis imaging.

Brian Hansen, Torben E Lund, Ryan Sangill, Ebbe Stubbe, Jürgen Finsterbusch, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian HansenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Torben E LundCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ryan SangillCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Ebbe StubbeDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jürgen FinsterbuschInstitut für Systemische Neurowissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Sune Nørhøj JespersenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN) and MINDLab, Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. sune@cfin.au.dk.

Funding

Development of MR Microscopy at the Cellular LevelR01EB012874 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BLACKBAND, STEPHEN J. · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe clinical use of kurtosis imaging is impeded by long acquisitions and postprocessing. Recently, estimation of mean kurtosis tensor W¯ and mean diffusivity ( D¯) was made possible from 13 distinct diffusion weighted MRI acquisitions (the 1-3-9 protocol) with simple postprocessing. Here, we analyze the effects of noise and nonideal diffusion encoding, and propose a new correction strategy. We also present a 1-9-9 protocol with increased robustness to experimental imperfections and minimal additional scan time. This refinement does not affect computation time and also provides a fast estimate of fractional anisotropy (FA). THEORY AND

methods1-3-9/1-9-9 data are acquired in rat and human brains, and estimates of D¯, FA, W¯ from human brains are compared with traditional estimates from an extensive diffusion kurtosis imaging data set. Simulations are used to evaluate the influence of noise and diffusion encodings deviating from the scheme, and the performance of the correction strategy. Optimal b-values are determined from simulations and data.

resultsAccuracy and precision in D¯ and W¯ are comparable to nonlinear least squares estimation, and is improved with the 1-9-9 protocol. The compensation strategy vastly improves parameter estimation in nonideal data.

conclusionThe framework offers a robust and compact method for estimating several diffusion metrics. The protocol is easily implemented. Magn Reson Med 76:1455-1468, 2016. © 2015 The Authors. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedNeuroimagingRatsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySignal-To-Noise Ratiodiffusionfractional anisotropyhigher-order tensorskurtosisorientational sampling

Identifiers

PMID26608731
PMCPMC4882290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.