Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608642›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2015

Assessing potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and predicting patient outcomes in Ontario's older population: a population-based cohort study applying subsets of the STOPP/START and Beers' criteria in large health administrative databases.

Lise M Bjerre, Timothy Ramsay, Catriona Cahir, Cristín Ryan, Roland Halil, Barbara Farrell, Kednapa Thavorn, Christina Catley, Steven Hawken, Ulrika Gillespie and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02555891 (Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02555891 unknown statusnot on this map

Assessing Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP) and Predicting Patient Outcomes in Ontario's Elderly Population Using the Modified STOPP Criteria in Large Administrative Health Databases (the PIP-STOPP Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorBruyère Health Research Institute.Ran2014Enrolled2,000,000ConditionsPotentially Inappropriate Prescribing (PIP)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Lise M BjerreDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ICES@ uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Timothy RamsaySchool of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Catriona CahirEconomic and Social Research Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cristín RyanSchool of Pharmacy, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Roland HalilDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Barbara FarrellDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornICES@ uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Christina CatleyICES@ uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Steven HawkenICES@ uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ulrika GillespieSchool of Pharmacy, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden.
Douglas G ManuelDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada ICES@ uOttawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CABruyère · CAOttawa Hospital · CAOttawa Hospital Research InstituteRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IETrinity College Dublin · IEUppsala University · SE

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 287245-HPM-BRUY-46830
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdverse drug events (ADEs) are common in older people and contribute significantly to emergency department (ED) visits, unplanned hospitalisations, healthcare costs, morbidity and mortality. Many ADEs are avoidable if attention is directed towards identifying and preventing inappropriate drug use and undesirable drug combinations. Tools exist to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in clinical settings, but they are underused. Applying PIP assessment tools to population-wide health administrative data could provide an opportunity to assess the impact of PIP on individual patients as well as on the healthcare system. This would open new possibilities for interventions to monitor and optimise medication management on a broader, population-level scale. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The aim of this study is to describe the occurrence of PIP in Ontario's older population (aged 65 years and older), and to assess the health outcomes and health system costs associated with PIP-more specifically, the association between PIP and the occurrence of ED visits, hospitalisations and death, and their related costs. This will be done within the framework of a population-based retrospective cohort study using Ontario's large health administrative and population databases. Eligible patients aged 66 years and older who were issued at least 1 prescription between 1 April 2003 and 31 March 2014 (approximately 2 million patients) will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ottawa Health Services Network Ethical Review Board and from the Bruyère Research Institute Ethics Review Board. Dissemination will occur via publication, presentation at national and international conferences, and ongoing exchanges with regional, provincial and national stakeholders, including the Ontario Drug Policy Research Network and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Registered with clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT02555891).

Indexed as

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListResearch DesignAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingLogistic ModelsLong-Term CareMaleMultivariate AnalysisEPIDEMIOLOGYGERIATRIC MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID26608642
PMCPMC4663446
OpenAlexW2195158249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.