Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608634›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

Specialised teams or personal continuity across inpatient and outpatient mental healthcare? Study protocol for a natural experiment.

Domenico Giacco, Victoria Jane Bird, Paul McCrone, Vincent Lorant, Pablo Nicaise, Andrea Pfennig, Michael Bauer, Mirella Ruggeri, Antonio Lasalvia, Jacek Moskalewicz and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mental health care for adult refugees in high-income countries.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2018
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Domenico GiaccoUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Victoria Jane BirdUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Paul McCroneHealth Service and Population Research Department, Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Vincent LorantInstitute of Health and Society IRSS, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health and Society IRSS, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium.
Andrea PfennigDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael BauerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Mirella RuggeriSection of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Antonio LasalviaSection of Psychiatry, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jacek MoskalewiczInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Marta WelbelInstitute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland.
Stefan PriebeUnit for Social and Community Psychiatry (World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMental healthcare organisation can either pursue specialisation, that is, distinct clinicians and teams for inpatient and outpatient care or personal continuity of care, that is, the same primary clinician for a patient across the two settings. Little systematic research has compared these approaches. Existing studies subject have serious methodological shortcomings. Yet, costly reorganisations of services have been carried out in different European countries, inconsistently aiming to achieve specialisation or personal continuity of care. More reliable evidence is required on whether specialisation or continuity of care is more effective and cost-effective, and whether this varies for different patient groups and contexts. DESIGN AND

methodsIn a natural experiment, we aim to recruit at least 6000 patients consecutively admitted to inpatient psychiatric care in Belgium, Germany, Italy, Poland, and the UK. In each country, care approaches supporting specialisation and personal continuity coexist. Patients will be followed up at 1 year to compare outcomes, costs and experiences. Inclusion criteria are: 18 years of age or older; clinical diagnosis of psychosis, affective disorder or anxiety/somatisation disorder; sufficient command of the language of the host country; absence of cognitive deterioration and/or organic brain disorders; and capacity to provide informed consent. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained in all countries: (1) England: NRES Committee North East-Newcastle & North Tyneside (ref: 14/NE/1017); (2) Belgium: Comité d'Ethique hospitalo-facultaire des Cliniques St-Luc; (3) Germany: Ethical Board, Technische Universität Dresden; (4) Italy: Comitati Etici per la sperimentazione clinica (CESC) delle provincie di Verona, Rovigo, Vicenza, Treviso, Padova; (5) Poland: Komisja Bioetyczna przy Instytucie Psychiatrii i Neurologii w Warszawie. We will disseminate the findings through scientific publications and a study-specific website. At the end of the study, we will develop recommendations for policy decision-making, and organise national and international workshops with stakeholders. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN registry: ISRCTN40256812.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CareHospitalizationSpecializationContinuity of Patient CareEuropeHumansMental Health ServicesResearch DesignMENTAL HEALTHPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID26608634
PMCPMC4663441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.