Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26608421›Full record

Trial reportActa veterinaria Scandinavica2015

Vaccination against Staphylococcus aureus mastitis in two Swedish dairy herds.

Håkan Landin, Marie Jansson Mörk, Maria Larsson, Karin Persson Waller

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Sanitation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Staphylococcal mastitis in dairy cows.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Håkan LandinVäxa Sverige, SE-104 25, Stockholm, Sweden. hakan.landin@vxa.se.
Marie Jansson MörkVäxa Sverige, SE-104 25, Stockholm, Sweden. marie.mork@vxa.se.
Maria LarssonEvidensia Djurkliniken Näset, SE-236 32, Höllviken, Sweden. maria.larsson@evidensia.se.
Karin Persson WallerDepartment of Animal Health and Antimicrobial Strategies, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), SE-75189, Uppsala, Sweden. karin.persson-waller@sva.se.
WSP Sverige (Sweden) · SESwedish Veterinary Agency · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus is a common udder pathogen in dairy cows, and may cause severe mastitis problems in some herds. In herds where normal control measures are not successful, vaccination might be an additional tool to use if sufficiently efficient. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a commercially available vaccine (Startvac(®), Hipra, Spain) in two commercial Swedish dairy herds where the control programs for S. aureus mastitis had been unsuccessful. Within each herd cows were randomly assigned to vaccine or control groups, and effects on udder health and milk production during 120 days after calving, and survival during the following lactation were evaluated.

resultsA field study was performed in two high producing Swedish herds having approximately 600 (herd A) and 200 (herd B) cows. During 12 months, cows with odd numbers were vaccinated three times around calving according to label protocol, while cows with even numbers constituted the not vaccinated control group. Quarter milk samples for bacteriological culturing were collected from all cases of clinical and subclinical mastitis. The outcome was evaluated during 120 days after calving using data on SCC and daily milk yield at monthly milk recordings, and incidence of mastitis due to S. aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, streptococci and coliforms. Cow survival throughout lactation was also studied. In herd A, 239 and 240 cows were included in the vaccinated and control groups, respectively. Corresponding numbers for herd B was 126 and 151 cows. Significant differences between vaccinated and control groups were not found in any of the parameters investigated.

conclusionsVaccination with a commercial polyvalent vaccine did not have any beneficial effects on udder health, milk production or survival in two commercial dairy herds with mastitis problems due to S. aureus.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesDairyingFemaleLactationLongevityMammary Glands, AnimalMastitis, BovineMilkStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcal VaccinesStaphylococcus aureusSwedenVaccinationStaphylococcal Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26608421
PMCPMC4660610
OpenAlexW2179718023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.