ArticleInternational journal of hematology2016
Proposal of criteria for dyserythropoiesis in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nuances of Morphology in Myelodysplastic Diseases in the Age of Molecular Diagnostics.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2017Review
- Histopathology in the diagnosis of high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEHReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The percentage manifesting dysplasia in bone marrow needed to qualify as significant is ≥10 % in each lineage. However, detailed analyses of this threshold have not been reported. Here, we analyzed dyserythropoiesis (dysE) in 109 myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) patients with 21 immune thrombocytopenia (ITP)/12 hemolytic anemia (HA) patients as a control. In present study, mild megaloblastic erythroblasts were specifically named 'red cell with abnormal chromatin clumping (RCACC)'. RCACC ≥10 % in erythroblasts was observed in 29 % of ITP patients and 58 % of HA patients. The numbers of MDS patients with RCACC in erythroblasts <10, 10-19 and ≥20 % were 1, 3, and 105, respectively. We analyzed dysE criteria according to the WHO classification (original WHO dysE). Most of our MDS patients (98 %) had original WHO dysE ≥20 %. The ITP patients with original WHO dysE ≥10 % was 48 %, and there were no ITP patients had original WHO dysE ≥20 %. Sixty-seven percent of HA patients had original WHO dysE ≥10 %, and three patients (25 %) had original WHO dysE ≥20 %. Raising the threshold of the original WHO dysE from 10 to 20 or 30 % may provide more suitable criteria. If RCACC is not included in dysE criteria, we think that '10 %' is a suitable threshold for the determination of dyserythropoiesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.